论行政复议审理方式的变革  

A Discussion on the Reform of Administrative Reconsideration Hearing Methods

作　　者：沈斌晨 Shen Binchen

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《湖湘法学评论》2022年第2期80-90,共11页HUXIANG LAW REVIEW

基　　金：国家社科基金专项:深化机构和行政体制改革的法治化研究--研究阐释党的十九大精神(18VSJ028)

摘　　要：现行《行政复议法》采取的以书面审理为主的方式由来已久,从当时的立法原因和实践状况来看,存在极大的“暗箱操作”风险和公正性存疑的缺陷。2020年《行政复议法(征求意见稿)》在审理方式上予以革新,将书面审理修改为听取意见,对行政复议成为化解行政争议的“主渠道”具有重要作用。这要求必须厘清行政复议审理方式的修法思路,进而在此种思路引导下确定不同审理方式的适用范围,明确听取意见程序性事项,保证行政复议人员资格严格化、层次化和多样化,以及赋予行政复议申请人程序选择权。The Administrative Reconsideration Law has a long history of adopting written adjudication,which has many shortcomings from the legislative reasons,academic evaluation and practice at that time.The Administrative Reconsideration Law(Draft for Soliciting Opinions)innovates in the hearing method,and turns written hearing into listening to opinions.It plays an important role in the analysis of the reasons for the change,the operation status and deficiencies in accordance with the provisions of the administrative review hearing method for administrative review to become the"main channel"for administrative dispute settlement.This requires that we should clarify the thoughts on the system design of administrative reconsideration hearing method,and then put forward suggestions on system modification under the guidance of such thoughts.

关 键 词：行政复议法 行政复议审理方式 程序正义 行政复议司法化 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]