《野草》系列刊物与1940年代的文艺领导权之争  

Wild Grass, with Its Magazine Series, and the Struggle for the Leadership of Art and Literature in the 1940s

作　　者：刘奎[1] Liu Kui

机构地区：[1]厦门大学台湾研究院

出　　处：《华文文学》2022年第3期14-25,共12页Literatures in Chinese

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“香港文艺期刊资料长编”,项目编号:19ZDA278。

摘　　要：《野草》系列期刊是1940年代重要的文学期刊,该刊集结了夏衍、聂绀弩、秦似等左翼文化人,在鲁迅之后继续发挥杂文的战斗作用。在抗战时期和解放战争时期,为争取民族解放,巩固左翼的文化领导权,该刊先后集中开展三次批判:一是批判战国策派,弘扬民族主义。二是批评自由主义。在冷战格局下,批判所谓的“第三条道路”。对沈从文的文艺和思想的批判,介于批判战国策派与自由主义之间。三是积极传播延安文艺思想,自觉开展批评与自我批评,开展国统区的整风运动。该刊对战国策派和自由主义的批判,是左翼文艺争取并逐步取得国统区文艺领导权的过程,自我批评是左翼文艺权势的内部重构,也是延安文艺思想确立全国性文化与思想领导权的一环。Wild Grass, with its magazine series, is an important literary magazine in the 1940s as it, gathering leftwing men of culture, such as Xia Yan, Nie Gan-Nu and Qin Si, played a fighting role in zawen(miscellaneous articles)subsequent to Lu Xun. During the period of the Anti-Japanese War and the War of Liberation, the magazine, for the purpose of fighting for the nation’s liberation and strengthening the cultural leadership of the left-wing, initiated three kinds of critique, of the Warring States Policy School in its promotion of nationalism;of liberalism and the Third Road in the paradigm of the Cold War, with its critique of Shen Congwen’s art and thought as something between that of the Warring States Policy and liberalism;and of conscious criticism and self-criticism by actively spreading Yanan thought of art and literature and engaging in the rectification movement in the Kuomintang-ruled areas. The magazine’s critique of the Warring States Policy School and liberalism is a process in which left-wing art and literature was struggling for, and gradually gained,the leadership of art and literature in the Kuomintang-ruled areas, with self-criticism being an internal construction of the left-wing powers of art and literature and also a link to Yanan thought of art and literature established as part of the leadership of national culture and thought.

关 键 词：《野草》 战国策派 自由主义 领导权 

分 类 号：I207[文学—中国文学]