超语行为研究的理论取向与哲学溯源  

Theoretical Orientations and Philosophical Origin of Translanguaging Studies

作　　者：王俊菊[1] 陈伟红[1,2] WANG Junju;CHEN Weihong

机构地区：[1]山东大学外国语学院 [2]泉州师范学院外国语学院

出　　处：《中国外语》2022年第3期69-76,共8页Foreign Languages in China

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“二语写作理论建构与本土化研究”(编号:17AYY022)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：近年来,超语行为(translanguaging)成为国际研究热点但国内关注不足。鉴于此,本文从概念衍变、理论观点、哲学基础、发展前景等方面对相关研究加以整合与讨论,分析超语行为所蕴含的非固态性语言本质和集成式语言资源储备,解读这一视角下的动态异质语言观、协同组合交际观、同步共融习得观和互动协商教学观等理论倾向,探讨超语行为所反映的后现代哲学特征,提出融合语言观和双语发展连续体等观点,并从理论建构、方法创新和交叉研究等方面展望超语行为研究的发展前景。In recent years,studies on translanguaging have been an international surge but received no due domestic attention yet.Given such a gap,this paper synthesizes and discusses studies on translanguaging from the perspectives of conceptual development,theoretical orientations,philosophical base and future prospects.It points out that conceptually translanguaging entails the non-solidity of language itself and the integrated feature of linguistic repertoire,that theoretically studies in this area embrace the orientations of the dynamic,hybrid view of language,the orchestrated,harmonious view of communication,the synchronous,integrated view of language acquisition,and the interactive,negotiable view of language pedagogy,and that philosophically postmodernism provides the base for its anti-foundationalism,irrationalism,pluralism,and humanism.This paper finally proposes the merged view of language and the continuum of bilingual development,and outlines the future of translanguaging studies in the aspects of theory building,research method innovation and other possible interdisciplinary investigations.

关 键 词：超语行为 概念衍变 理论观点 哲学基础 发展前景 

分 类 号：H319[语言文字—英语]