检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Jiani CHEN Lu CHEN Chuan YAN Zibo YU Yuqi ZOU Yue-Hua SUN
机构地区:[1]Institute of Innovation Ecology,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China [2]Institute of Zoology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China [3]College of Life Science,Hebei University,Baoding 071002,China [4]School of Natural Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China
出 处:《Current Zoology》2022年第3期315-323,共9页动物学报(英文版)
基 金:This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Project No.31501868 and No.32070445);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(Project No.lzujbky-2020-ct02).
摘 要:In recent years,researchers have been attempting to relate differences in personality(e.g.,boldness,aggressiveness,exploration tendency)to variation in cognition(performances in tasks that require learning,reasoning,attention,or memory,etc.)both theoretically and empirically.However,it is unclear on what basis personality and cognition might be associated with each other.Previous theory suggests a connection between fast–slow personality types and cognitive speed–accuracy tradeoffs.In this study,we tested this hypothesis in budgerigars and found that,in their 1st associative learning,birds with fast personality(less fearful of handling stress)were fast learners in the beginning,while slow personality individuals improved faster,but both types of birds did not differ in accuracy.However,these relationships were context-dependent.No significant relationship was found in subsequent learning tasks(reversal learning and a 2nd associative learning)in the familiar context(task setup and apparatus similar to the 1st associative learning).We then conducted a problem-solving experiment with novel setup and apparatus to test 1 possible explanation that the association between personality and cognition in the 1st associative learning might be caused by noncognitive constraint,such as fearfulness when facing novel task setup and apparatus.We found that fast individuals interacted more with the problem box and solved it,whereas the slow birds were not.We suggest that personalities can influence cognitive performances and trigger a cognitive speed-improvement tradeoff under the novel context.However,there are no consistent cognitive styles that co-varied with different personalities.
关 键 词:BUDGERIGAR COGNITION learning accuracy learning speed PERSONALITY
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3