检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王晓丹[1] 孙静[1] 王淑敏[1] 王秀霞[1] 王兰英[2] WANG Xiaodan;SUN Jing;WANG Shumin;WANG Xiuxia;WANG Lanying(Intensive Care Unit,Shangqiu First People's Hospital,Shangqiu 476000,China;Nursing Department,Shangqiu First People's Hospital,Shangqiu 476000,China)
机构地区:[1]商丘市第一人民医院重症监护室,河南商丘476000 [2]商丘市第一人民医院护理部,河南商丘476000
出 处:《临床医学工程》2022年第6期835-836,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
基 金:2018年度河南省医学科技攻关计划普通项目(项目编号:2018701027)。
摘 要:目的 探讨基于临床路径的整体护理模式对重症肺炎患者康复效果的影响。方法 105例重症肺炎患者随机分为两组,对照组给予常规护理,观察组给予基于临床路径的整体护理,比较两组的干预效果。结果 观察组的机械通气时间、住院时间均短于对照组(P<0.05);护理后,观察组的FVC、 FEV_(1)、 FEV_(1)/FVC均高于对照组,并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 基于临床路径的整体护理模式可促进重症肺炎患者康复,改善肺功能,降低并发症风险。Objective To explore the impact of holistic nursing mode based on clinical pathway on rehabilitation effect of patients with severe pneumonia. Methods 105 patients with severe pneumonia were randomly divided into two groups. The control group received regular nursing, and the observation group received holistic nursing based on clinical pathway. The intervention effects of the two groups were compared. Results The mechanical ventilation time and hospitalization time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group(P <0.05). After nursing, the FVC, FEV_(1) and FEV_(1)/FVC of the observation group were higher than those of the control group,and the incidence of complications was lower than that of the control group(P <0.05). Conclusions Holistic nursing mode based on clinical pathway can promote the recovery of patients with severe pneumonia, improve lung function, and reduce the risk of complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.235