检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫海伦 YAN Hailun(School of Civil,Commercial and Economic Law,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088
出 处:《绵阳师范学院学报》2022年第6期42-50,64,共10页Journal of Mianyang Teachers' College
基 金:2019年度司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“共享经济法律规制理论基础研究”(19SFB2048)。
摘 要:近年来,以多层次分销经营为主要模式的分销型社交电商涉嫌传销问题频频发生。分销型社交电商合法的多层级分销经营模式与传销在形式上极为相似,但是二者在商业逻辑、盈利模式以及是否注重对消费者的保护等方面存在实质性的差别。现行《禁止传销条例》中关于传销的界定并不能完全适用于“互联网+”时代下对社交电商是否涉嫌传销的判定。实践中,监管部门也仅依据“入门费”“拉人头”和“团队计酬”的形式特征来认定分销型社交电商的传销行为。面对分销型社交电商发展进程中遭遇的法律困境,监管者应当厘清传销的实质特征在于欺诈,并在此基础上结合传销的形式特征,以此作为认定分销型社交电商传销的标准。In recent years,distribution-based social e-commerce businesses with multi-level distribution operations as the main model have frequently been suspected of multi-level marketing(MLM)problems.The legal multi-level distribution business model of distribution-based social e-commerce is very similar in form to MLM,but there are substantial differences between the two in terms of business logic,profit model,and whether they pay attention to consumer protection.The definition of MLM in the current"Regulations on Prohibition of MLM"is not fully applicable to the determination of whether social e-commerce is suspected of MLM in the"Internet+"era.In practice,the regulatory authorities also only determine the MLM behavior of the distribution-type social e-commerce based on the formal characteristics of"introduction fee","recruitment"and"team compensation".Facing the legal dilemma encountered in the development of distribution-based social e-commerce,regulators should clarify that the substantive feature of MLM is fraud,and on this basis,combine the formal characteristics of MLM as the standard for identifying distribution-based social e-commerce MLM.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7