“后真理”时代环境科学知识在民主治理中的角色定位研究  

Research on the Role Positioning of Environmental Science Knowledgein Democratic Governance in the “Post-truth” Era

作　　者：郭佳楠 GUO Jianan(School of Environment,Resources and Development,Asian Institute of Technology,Klong Luang,Bangkok 12120,Thailand)

机构地区：[1]亚洲理工学院发展与可持续性系,曼谷空滦12120

出　　处：《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第3期13-25,共13页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：在“后真理”时代,情感及个人信念比客观事实更能影响公众舆论,让科学的话语权与公信力逐渐被弱化,取而代之的是在“认知平等与民主化科学”的幌子下从内容与体制上诋毁科学。由此,“后真理”视野下的科学与环境政策领域,迫切需要重塑科学与民主的关系,倡导在科学-政策-社会三方之间多维互动的制度建构基础上合理避免技术专家治国论绝对化和狭隘化的治理困境,以期找到超越专家政治局限性的可能之路。这要求走向一种基于环境科学知识民主的民主治理新范式,这种民主治理强调从基于负责任性的知识生产、基于多样性与论争性的知识应用、基于包容性的知识评价三个维度搭建该范式的基本框架,重估专家体制的民主价值,为高度复杂性、不确定性的环境风险治理提供新的行动指引。In the“post-truth”era,emotions and personal beliefs can affect public opinion more than objective facts,so that the discourse power and credibility of science are gradually weakened.Instead,science is slandered from the content and system under the guise of“cognitive equality and democratized science”.Therefore,in the field of science and environmental policy in the“post-truth”era,it is urgent to reshape the relationship between science and democracy,to advocate reasonably avoiding the absolute and narrow governance dilemma of technocracy on the basis of the system construction which emphasizes multi-dimensional interaction between science,policy and society,in order to find a possible way to surpass the limitations of expert politics.This requires moving towards a new paradigm of democratic governance based on environmental science and knowledge democracy.This democratic governance emphasizes building the basic framework of the paradigm from three dimensions:responsible and capricious knowledge production,diversified and controversial knowledge application,and inclusive knowledge evaluation,so as to reassess the democratic value of the expert system and provide new action guidelines for highly complex and uncertain environmental risk governance.

关 键 词：“后真理”时代 环境科学知识 技术专家治国论 负责任性 多样性与论争性 包容性 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学] G301[文化科学]