新《中国民法典》分则以及《德国民法典》中的动产善意取得——法律比较  

Der gutglaubige Erwerb beweglicher Sachen im Besonderen Teil des neuen chinesischen Zivilgesetzbuches(ZGB-BT)and im deutschen BGB——ein Rechtsvergleich

作　　者： 王轶(译) Michael Kort;WANG Yi

机构地区：[1]德国奥格斯堡大学法学院 [2]慕尼黑大学法学院

出　　处：《中德法学论坛》2021年第2期3-31,共29页

摘　　要：随着《中国民法典》在2020年通过,一部规范化的物权法也随之产生,该法与2007年首次在中国被规范化的物权法基本一致,但也包含了一些创新与澄清。与《德国民法典》的物权法规定相比,引人注目的是,中国物权法——除了没有分离原则和相关的抽象原则外——与德国法有许多共同之处。但是,《中国民法典》分则中的物权法包含一个对动产物权和不动产物权同样适用的“总则”部分。动产物权与不动产物权如此深远的平等性也体现在从无权处分人处取得的规则上。与德国不同的是,中国的善意取得法在规则上并未得到明显地区分,而是总体上都包含在《中国民法典》分则第311条这一基本规范中。尽管如此,通过与德国法的法律比较可以看出,中国法上的善意取得法与德国法并无本质区别。The article deals with a comparison of the Law of Acquisition of Real Rights(Property)of movable goods in good faith in China and in Germany.In 2020,with the Special Provisions of the Chinese Civil Code,inter alia a new statutory Real Rights(Property)Law has been established,which is in large parts identical with the statutory Real Rights(Property)Law standardized for the first time in China in 2007,but also contains some new aspects and clarifications.Compared with the Real Rights(Property)Law provisions of the German Civil Code(BGB),it is striking that Chinese Real Rights(Property)Law has many similarities with the German Law,apart from the absence of the German principle of separation between the contractual obligation(causa)as such and the material transfer agreement.However,in contrast to the German Law,the Real Rights(Property)Law of the new Chinese Civil Code contains a kind of"general part",which applies equally to movable goods and to immovable goods.Such a far-reaching equalization of Real Rights(Property)Law concerning movable goods and immovable goods exists in Chines Law also on the field of the Law concerning good faith-acquisition of property from a non-authorized non-owner of the good.In contrast to the German Law,the Chinese right of the acquisition in good faith is not very strongly differentiated,but is contained essentially in only one provision,§311 of the new Chinese Civil Code.Nevertheless,a comparison of the main structure of the Chinese Law on good faith-acquisition of property with the respective German Law structure shows that the structures are quite similar.

关 键 词：所有权保护 公示 分离原则 一体原则 所有权取得的形式 善意取得 善意取得时的合理价格 船舶、航空器和机动车 脱手物 无负担取得 时效取得 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]