检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张晓君[1] ZHANG Xiaojun;U Win Myint
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学国际法学院 [2]缅甸联邦最高检察院
出 处:《东南亚纵横》2021年第6期48-55,共8页Crossroads:Southeast Asian Studies
基 金:2019年教育部重大招标课题《“一带一路”沿线国家投资风险监测预警体系研究》(19ZJD053)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:缅甸联邦共和国检察制度受英国影响较大,缅甸联邦最高检察院(原联邦总检察长办公室)是缅甸的最高检察机关,缅甸检察机关的职能范围较广泛,承担政府的法律顾问、国家的公诉人、法律的草拟与审查人等多重角色。缅甸检察机关与中国检察机关在机构设置、参与刑事诉讼和民事诉讼的职权范围、咨询顾问及立法职能上具有明显的差异。文章通过比较分析缅甸检察制度与中国检察制度的异同,深化两国司法环境的了解,为中缅两国共同推进“一带一路”建设提供法律保障。The procuratori al system of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar is greatly influenced by the United Kingdom. The Ministry of Legal Affairs of Myanmar(formerly the Office of the Attorney-general) is the highest procuratorial organ in Myanmar. The procuratorial organ of Myanmar has a wide range of functions, assuming multiple roles such as legal adviser of the government, public prosecutor of the state, drafter of laws, and censor. There are obvious differences between Myanmar’s procuratorial organs and those of China in an institutional setting, scope of functions and powers for participating in criminal and civil litigation, consultation, and legislative functions. By comparing and analyzing the similarities and differences of the procuratorial system in Myanmar and in China, this paper deepens the understanding of the judicial environment of the two countries and provides legal guarantees for the joint promotion of the "Belt and Road" construction between China and Myanmar.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249