算力盗用:一种新型财产侵害  

Computing Power Stolen:A New Encroachment of Property

作　　者：汤道路[1] Tang Daolu(School of Humanities and Arts,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou Jiangsu 221000)

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学人文学院,江苏徐州221000

出　　处：《政法论丛》2022年第3期132-140,共9页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部重大攻关项目“科学构建数据治理体系研究”(21JZD036)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：在数字经济社会,算力是国家核心竞争力之一。算力商品化推动算力逐步脱离特定的计算设备,从设备性能指标符号转化为具有使用价值和交换价值的新型财产。确认算力财产权,并建立健全相应的算力财产保护制度,是现代法治的时代使命。算力盗用分为程序植入型和账号获取型两类,其实质均是对算力新型财产的侵害。算力盗用在民法构成民事侵权,应当承担赔偿损失为主的侵权责任,实践中应当重点调整和完善算力损失计算方法;算力盗用情节严重的,在刑法上构成侵犯财产犯罪,主要适用盗窃罪或职务侵占罪,应当调整和完善犯罪数额标准、“多次”、“利用职务上的便利”等具体犯罪认定规则。In the digital economic society, computing power is one of the core competitiveness between countries. The progress of commercialization gradually transformed computing power from specifications of equipment to new forms of property with special use value and exchange value.It is the mission of the modern rule of law to confirm the property right of computing power and to establish and complete corresponding computing power protection regulations. There are two type of computing power stolen as program implanting and account acquiring,which all substantially harmed the property right of computing power. In civil law, computing power stolen may generate tort liability mainly as loss compensation, and meanwhile the loss calculation standards shall be adjust and corrected in practice. In criminal law, computing power stolen in cases of gross violation may constitute offences against property such as larceny and misappropriation, and related conviction rules according to the theft amount, the frequency, the usage of duty in convenience, shall be adjust and improved.

关 键 词：算力网络 算力盗用 算力财产权 算力侵权 财产犯罪 

分 类 号：DF526[政治法律—民商法学]