《法庭之友意见书》中的历史资料与“南海仲裁裁决”之关系  

Relationship between the Historical Data in Amicus Curiae Submission and the “Award in the South China Sea Arbitration”

作　　者：刘旭 LIU Xu(Institute of History,Guangzhou Academy of Social Sciences,Guangzhou 510410,China)

机构地区：[1]广州市社会科学院历史研究所,广州510410

出　　处：《海南热带海洋学院学报》2022年第3期10-18,34,共10页Journal of Hainan Tropical Ocean University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(21&ZD226)。

摘　　要：近年来,“南海仲裁案”引起各方的高度关注,围绕南海争端的国际法律战和舆论战急剧升温。中国台湾方面提出的《法庭之友意见书》,从人类历史、淡水、植被和经济生活等方面证明,太平岛是符合《联合国海洋法公约》的岛屿,而非礁石。“南海仲裁庭”利用该意见书中的历史资料,从淡水、植被、土壤、渔民,特别是商业活动的角度,牵强附会地做出偏颇的结论,加剧了南海局势的恶化,不利于地区和平稳定。该“裁决”有选择地使用文献材料,其结论是非法的、无效的,其手法应当引起我们重视。In recent years,the“South China Sea arbitration”has attracted great attention from all parties.The international legal warfare and public opinion warfare have heated up sharply surrounding the South China Sea dispute.Amicus Curiae Submission by Taiwan of China has proved that Taiping Island is an“island”rather than a“rock”in line with the UNCLOS from the aspects of human history,fresh water,vegetation and economic life.The“South China Sea arbitral tribunal”uses historical data of the submission to make biased conclusions from the aspects of fresh water,vegetation,soil,fishermen,especially commercial activities,which exacerbates the deterioration of the situation in the South China Sea and is not conducive to regional peace and stability.The“arbitration award”selectively uses document data,and its conclusions are illegal and invalid.This method should attract our attention.

关 键 词：历史资料 《法庭之友意见书》 “南海仲裁案” 太平岛 

分 类 号：D993.5[政治法律—国际法学]