经史之间:蒙文通的素王革命论  

Between Confucian Classics and Historiography: Meng Wentong’s Theory on the “Uncrowned King” and Revolution

作　　者：鲍有为 Bao Youwei

机构地区：[1]浙江师范大学人文学院,321000

出　　处：《史学理论研究》2022年第3期125-132,160,共9页Historiography Bimonthly

基　　金：浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地(浙江师范大学江南文化研究中心)课题“晚清今文经学的展开与圣义理之学的解读”(项目编号:20JDZD013)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：民国时期社会政治的改变及经学的史学化重新激起了有关今文经学义理的探讨。蒙文通受廖平思想的影响,由早期今古文经学的探究上溯周秦学术,继而梳理周秦思想脉络,并在民国政治革命的影响下,提炼出孔孟儒学的内在精神,即与今文经学密切相关的素王革命论。对素王革命论的论述表明,蒙文通意图通过史学研究超越晚清的今文经学,探究周秦两汉之学的真谛。蒙文通以现代史学的方式重估经学,是经学的史学化,其中的现代性毋庸置疑。The social and political changes together with the historicization of Confucian classics in the Republica of China gave rise to the discussion of the New Text Confucianism. Influenced by Liao Ping,Meng Wentong explored the Confucianism of the Zhou and Qin Dynasties through the exploration of the New Text Confucianism. In the context of the political revolution of the Republic of China,he argued for the internal spirit of Confucius-Mencius Confucianism,that is,the theory on “uncrowned king” and “Revolution ”(which literary means “a kingly revolution led by Confucius”). Through historical research,Meng Wengtong intended to surpass the study of the New Text Confucianism in the late Qing Dynasty and to explore the true thought of the Zhou,Qin and Han Dynasties. His revaluation of Confucian classics is an important step to historicalize traditional Confucian classics and he introduced modern historiography in order to re-evaluate the study of the classics. It is beyond doubt that Meng’s research bears significant elements of modernity.

关 键 词：今文经学 廖平 蒙文通 素王革命论 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学] K258