检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏祖川 Su Zuchuan
机构地区:[1]重庆依斯特律师事务所
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2022年第2期74-79,共6页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
摘 要:辩护权在疫情背景下面临一些新问题。有关部门允许辩护人会见的标准不统一,缺乏信息公开的统一线上渠道,部分律师不掌握线上阅卷方法。远程视频庭审缺乏统一规则,且存在对辩护权保障不足的风险。问题成因在于疫情对刑事诉讼传统理论和制度带来冲击,程序细节设置的缺失等。未来短期内需注意改进程序细节,长期看应以疫情推动制度建构,并进行新的诉讼理论思考,以更新的理念重视程序细节问题。Defense rights are facing some new problems in the context of COVID-19.Relevant departments are not unified in their standards for allowing defenders to meet,and there are no unified online channel for information disclosure.Some lawyers do not master the methods of marking online.In the epidemic,remote video trials lack unified rules,and there is a risk of insufficient protection of the Defense rights.The cause of the problem lies in the impact of the epidemic on the traditional theory and system of criminal procedure,and the lack of procedural details.In the short-term future,attention should be paid to improve procedural details.In the long run,we should promote the system construction of criminal proceedings,make new litigation theory thinking and improve the procedural details with updated ideas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7