检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡义文 刘媛 李慧琼 宋闯 CAI Yiwen;LIU Yuan;LI Huiqiong;SONG Chuang(Guangzhou Huamiao Biotechnology Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510440,Guangdong,China)
机构地区:[1]广州华淼生物科技研究院有限公司,广东广州510440
出 处:《香料香精化妆品》2022年第3期66-69,共4页Flavour Fragrance Cosmetics
摘 要:使用物理化学法和人体法分别对两种膏霜类化妆品进行保湿功效的评价,并将两种方法的保湿功效测试结果进行Pearson相关性分析比较。结果表明,物理化学法和人体法测得膏霜类化妆品保湿能力具有相似性,其中物理化学法和人体法的Pearson相关系数r为0.416,显著性P为0.048,表明物理化学法和人体法测得的保湿结果显著相关,为合理评价膏霜类化妆品保湿功效提供依据。The physical-chemistry method and the human-body method were used to evaluate the moisturizing efficacy of two cream cosmetics,and the Pearson correlation analysis was carried out to compare their test results.The experimental results showed that the moisturizing ability of cream cosmetics measured by the two methods were similar.The Pearson correlation coefficient r of the physical-chemistry method and the human-body method was 0.416,and the significance P was 0.048,indicating that results obtained from two methods were significantly correlated.This study aimed to provide a basis for moisturizing efficacy evaluation of cream cosmetics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.248