检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:单奕铭 Shan Yiming(Law School of Henan University of Technology,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出 处:《铁道警察学院学报》2022年第2期49-53,共5页Journal of Railway Police College
基 金:最高人民检察院检察理论研究项目“刑罚变更执行检察监督研究”(GJ2021D21);河南工业大学高层次人才基金项目“终身监禁制度研究”(2020SBS04)。
摘 要:从解释学角度分析,我国刑法中的无期徒刑与终身监禁在法律性质、适用范围、法律后果、诉讼程序和管辖方面存在明显区别。无期徒刑与终身监禁都是自由刑发展完善的表现。我国刑法中无期徒刑的修订与终身监禁的入刑,均与死刑的废止和适用密切相关。比较而言,将可以减刑、假释的无期徒刑作为死刑替代措施更加合理。From the perspective of hermeneutics,life imprisonment and imprisonment for life in Chinese criminal law are of obvious difference as to legal nature,scope of application,legal consequence,litigation procedure and jurisdiction.They both are the development results of penalty against liberty.The revision of life imprisonment in Chinese criminal law,as well as the introduction to imprisonment for life is closely related to the abolition and application of death penalty.By comparison,it is more rational to take life imprisonment with penalty reduction and parole as an alternative to death penalty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.157.68