检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴孝槐[1] 肖巧喆 庞万勇 白玉 李垚[5] 卢选成[6] 冯涛[1] WU Xiaohuai;XIAO Qiaozhe;PANG Wanyong;BAI Yu;LI Yao;LU Xuancheng;FENG Tao(China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment,Beijing 100062,China;China Certification and Accreditation Association,Beijing 100020,China;Translational In Vivo Model Research Platform,Sanofi G&D,Beijing 100022,China;Beijing Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Technology Co.,LTD,Beijing 102206,China;School of Medicine,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China;Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Beijing 102206,China)
机构地区:[1]中国合格评定国家认可中心,北京100062 [2]中国认证认可协会,北京100020 [3]赛诺菲公司全球研发中心转化体内模型研究平台,北京100022 [4]北京诺和诺德医药科技有限公司,北京102206 [5]上海交通大学医学院,上海200240 [6]中国疾病预防控制中心,北京102206
出 处:《实验动物与比较医学》2022年第3期237-243,共7页Laboratory Animal and Comparative Medicine
基 金:中国合格评定国家认可委员会科技项目(2019 CNAS12)。
摘 要:中国合格评定国家认可委员会(China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment,CNAS)实验动物机构认可是我国实验动物管理的重要制度,是致力于保障我国实验动物质量和福利的一项具有中国特色的第三方评价制度。美国实验动物饲养管理评估认证协会(Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care,AAALAC)认证是为全球实验动物管理和使用机构提供动物福利和伦理认证服务的一种评价活动。本文从CNAS与AAALAC的性质、CNAS认可和AAALAC认证本质、评价依据和文件、评审流程、评审人员管理、结果采信等方面进行了比较分析,探讨两项实验动物机构评价制度的差异与特点。China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment(CNAS)laboratory animal institutions accreditation is an important system for the management of laboratory animals in China.It is a thirdparty evaluation on Chinese characteristics dedicated to ensuring the quality and welfare of laboratory animals in China.The American Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care(AAALAC)certification provides global services about animal welfare evaluation and ethical certification,which are important for management and use of laboratory animals.This study compared and analyzed the nature of CNAS and AAALAC,the nature of CNAS accreditation and AAALAC certification,the evaluation principles,required documents,the evaluation process,the management of reviewers,and the acceptance of results,and discussed the differences and characteristics of the two evaluation systems for laboratory animal institutions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90