检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王厚双[1] 王柏 Wang Houshuang;Wang Bai
机构地区:[1]辽宁大学金融与贸易学院、自由贸易试验区研究院 [2]辽宁大学
出 处:《日本学刊》2022年第3期92-123,150,151,共34页Japanese Studies
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“构建‘人类命运共同体’进程中国际经贸规则重构博弈与中国的战略选择”(编号:19ZDA053)。
摘 要:如何有效处理国际贸易摩擦,是一个重大的理论问题,更是一个亟待解决的现实问题。运用历史分析和比较分析的方法进行研究发现,面对肇始于20世纪50年代中期跌宕起伏的日美贸易摩擦,日本经历了从完全依赖双边谈判手段到以双边谈判手段为主、被动使用法律手段为辅,以法律手段为主、双边谈判手段为辅,再到两种手段配合运用对美国实施“进攻”的处理手段转换过程。这一手段转换过程并非只是日本的一厢情愿,而是日美两国围绕贸易摩擦处理问题进行博弈的结果,也是日本在深刻的经验教训中意识觉醒、理念升华的痛苦过程。日本比较成功地实现了处理日美贸易摩擦两种手段的转换乃至相互配合,既放大了运用单一手段的积极效果,也压缩了其消极影响,有效捍卫了国家利益。日本处理日美贸易摩擦的经验教训或可为中国所借鉴。The way to deal with international trade friction effectively is not only a major theoretical problem,but also a practical problem to be solved urgently.Using historical analysis and comparative analysis of Japan-U.S.trade friction,the article argues that Japan experienced the process of changing ways to deal with the trade friction from completely relying on bilateral negotiations,mainly working on bilateral negotiation means and passively adopting legal means,mainly working on legal means and adopting bilateral negotiation means complementary,to adapting the both means actively to respond to the U.S.pressure.That changes of means are not just Japan’s wishful thinking but the result of the game between Japan and the U.S.in terms of means of dealing with trade friction.Japan has realized successful changes and combination both means to deal with the trade friction.In the process of dealing with the Japan-U.S.trade friction,Japan has not only amplified the positive effect of adopting a single means but also compressed its negative effect in defending its national interests.The experiences of Japan’s changes of way to deal with Japan-U.S.trade friction are worth learning.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.190.158.12