“公共善”:关于新闻侵权诉讼中的责任认定与利益平衡——从《民法典》视角再看世奢会与《新京报》等名誉侵权纠纷案  

The "Common Good" :Liability Determination and Balance of Interests in Press Infringement Litigation

作　　者：陈科 姜译涵 Chen Ke;Jiang Yihan

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学新闻传播学院,湖北武汉430070

出　　处：《传媒观察》2022年第4期43-51,共9页Media Observer

摘　　要：世奢会(北京)国际商业管理有限公司诉《新京报》等名誉权侵权责任纠纷案,是我国少有的新闻报道使用匿名消息来源涉诉的案件,因对使用匿名消息来源的报道内容真实性的不同认定而同案异判。该案涉及法技术领域的举证责任分配及新闻报道者特权问题;同时也关涉法感情层面新闻正义与民事主体人格权的冲突与协调问题。该案对报道是否失实、评论是否正当及报道者是否具有主观恶意等侵权构成要件的裁判,与新近施行的《民法典》对舆论监督及为公共利益等免责事由的系统化创新关联密切,是新时期司法审判工作在新闻媒体舆论监督与公民权益保护的平衡问题上的典型案例。The case of World Luxury Association(Beijing) International Business Management Co.,Ltd. v. The Beijing News is one of the rare cases in China in which the use of anonymous sources in news reporting is involved in litigation. The same case was decided differently because of the different determinations of the authenticity in the content of the reports using anonymous sources.The case involves the allocation of the burden of proof in the technical field of law and the privilege of news reporters. It also involves the conflict and reconciliation between news justice and the personality rights of civil subjects at the level of law and emotion. This is a typical judicial case in the new era on the balance between the supervision of public opinion by the news media and the protection of citizens’ rights and interests.

关 键 词：匿名信息来源 举证责任 新闻正义 舆论监督 公共利益 

分 类 号：G206[文化科学—传播学] DF5[政治法律—民商法学]