检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚琴 Yao Qin(Department of History,Xiamen University,Xiamen,Fujian,361001,China)
出 处:《古代文明(中英文)》2022年第3期73-82,158,共11页The Journal of Ancient Civilizations
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目“简牍所见秦汉赋税体系研究”(项目批号:21BZS041)阶段性成果。
摘 要:“与盗同法”与盗罪并列,同属秦代《盗律》所包含的罪名。其惩治重于盗罪及“坐赃为盗”,且惩治内容也区别于盗罪。除盗罪外,其它各类官吏经济犯罪的惩治根据具体犯罪情形及官吏身份的不同,分别适用于“与盗同法”和“坐赃为盗”,此二者互为补充。从对官吏为盗、治狱官吏受财及新地吏受财的惩治中,可见“与盗同法”罪对“数罪从重”、“官吏犯罪从重”两个原则的应用。这不仅证实了官吏的经济犯罪惩治要重于百姓的同等犯罪,同时也能反映秦法治吏的详密与灵活。Yudao tongfa(与盗同法,same law as theft)is a crime juxtaposed with the crime of theft in Daolv(《盗律》,the law of theft)of the Qin Dynasty.The punishment for that crime is heavier than the crimes of theft and taking bribes.The punishments applicable to the economic crimes committed by officials included the crime of theft,yudao tongfa,and taking bribes.Looking into the punishments of officials who committed theft,judicial officials taking bribes,and new territory officials taking bribes,it can be concluded that the punishment for economic crimes by officials was heavier than the equivalent crimes by the masses,which reflects the meticulousness of the Qin law system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.219.214