检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董晓婉 王方舒 王玉玺 陈栋[1,2] 毕学军 舒啸[1] DONG Xiao-wan;WANG Fang-shu;WANG Yu-xi;CHEN Dong;BI Xue-jun;SHU Xiao(School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering,Qingdao University of Technology,Qingdao 266525,China;National Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Municipal Wastewater Treatment and Recycling,Qingdao 266525,China)
机构地区:[1]青岛理工大学环境与市政工程学院,山东青岛266525 [2]城镇污水处理与资源化国家地方联合工程中心,山东青岛266525
出 处:《中国给水排水》2022年第11期68-73,共6页China Water & Wastewater
基 金:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2017ZX07101002-06);山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2020ME225)。
摘 要:以磺胺甲基嘧啶(SM1)、磺胺甲恶唑(SMZ)、四环素(TC)、罗红霉素(ROX)、氧氟沙星(OFL)、咖啡因(CF)、对乙酰氨基酚(AP)等7种典型药物为研究对象,选择MSBR、BAF两个实际污水处理系统和一个多级A/O-MBBR中试处理系统,通过高效液相色谱质谱技术(HPLC-MS)检测7种药物在不同工艺单元的浓度水平,考察不同系统对不同药物的去除效果。结果表明,MSBR系统对7种药物的去除效果为AP>CF>OFL>TC>ROX>SM1>SMZ,BAF系统为CF>ROX>AP>OFL>TC>SMZ>SM1,多级A/O-MBBR中试系统为AP>CF>OFL>ROX>TC>SM1>SMZ。3个处理系统对AP、CF、OFL和TC的去除率没有显著差异;BAF系统对SM1的去除率仅为6.8%,显著低于其他两个系统;多级A/O-MBBR系统对SMZ的去除率仅为10.75%,显著低于其他两个系统;BAF系统对ROX的去除率高达92.9%,显著高于其他两个系统。Two practical wastewater treatment systems(MSBR and BAF)and a multi-stage A/O-MBBR pilot treatment system were applied to treat seven typical pharmaceuticals including SM1,SMZ,TC,ROX,OFL,CF and AP.Their concentrations in different units of the treatment system were determined by HPLC-MS,and the removal effects of different pharmaceuticals by different treatment systems were investigated.For MSBR system,the removal efficiency of seven pharmaceuticals in descending order was as follows:AP,CF,OFL,TC,ROX,SM1 and SMZ,for BAF system was CF,ROX,AP,OFL,TC,SMZ and SM1,and for multi-stage A/O-MBBR pilot system was AP,CF,OFL,ROX,TC,SM1 and SMZ.There was no significant difference in the removal efficiency of AP,CF,OFL and TC among the three systems.The SM1 removal efficiency of the BAF system was only 6.8%,which was significantly lower than that of the other two systems.The SMZ removal efficiency of the multi-stage A/O-MBBR system was only 10.75%,which was significantly lower than that of the other two systems.The ROX removal efficiency of the BAF system was 92.9%,which was significantly higher than that of the other two systems.
分 类 号:X703[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68