从“江歌案”看《民法典》的司法适用及其争议——兼与本案相关论点商榷  

On the Judicial Application of the“Civil Code”and Its Disputes from“Jiang Ge Case”——A Discussion with the Relevant Arguments in This Case

作　　者：金可可[1] 谈天 Jin Keke;Tan Tian

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200042

出　　处：《探索与争鸣》2022年第4期115-125,179,共12页Exploration and Free Views

摘　　要：在“江歌案”中,被告因与受害人结成危险共同体及引入危险的在先行为,负有保护被害人法益的若干行为义务,其对义务的违反具有违法性与过错。在因果关系判定上,可适当放宽要求,采用“若无则不的高度概率”标准。在赔偿层面,被告仅负部分赔偿责任,依据是安全保障义务规则的类推适用;法政策上,尚可考虑其负连带责任的可能性;被告事后对原告有不当言论,宜另行评价;“江歌案”精神损害赔偿数额有进一步提高空间。除过错侵权规则外,原告还可依见义勇为/无因管理规则请求补偿损失,此时,应回归无因管理规则探寻可补偿损失的标准。In the“Jiang Ge case”,the defendant has several behavioral obligations to protect the legal interests of the victim due to the prior act of forming a dangerous community with the victim and introducing danger,and its violation of the obligations is illegal and wrong.In the judgment of causality,the requirements can be relaxed appropriately.At the level of compensation,the defendant only bears part of the liability for compensation,which is based on the analogy of the rules of security obligations.In terms of law and policy,the possibility of joint and several liability can be considered.If the defendant makes improper remarks about the plaintiff afterward,it can be evaluated separately.There is room for further improvement in the amount of spiritual damage compensation in the“Jiang Ge Case”.In addition to the fault infringement rules,the plaintiff can also request compensation for losses according to the courageous/non-cause management rules.At this time,the plaintiff should return to the non-cause management rules to explore the standard of compensable losses.

关 键 词：交往安全义务 间接侵权 数人侵权 见义勇为 无因管理 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]