困惑中前行:中国人类学学科发展之争与反思展望  

Moving forward in Bewilderment:The Debate and Reflection on The Development of Chinese Anthropology

作　　者：王佳果 许宪隆[3] WANG Jia-guo;XU Xian-long

机构地区：[1]中南民族大学,湖北武汉430074 [2]桂林理工大学旅游与风景园林学院,广西桂林541004 [3]中南民族大学民族学与社会学学院,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《青海民族研究》2022年第1期104-112,共9页Qinghai Journal of Ethnology

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“近代少数民族先贤名人爱国情怀研究”(批准号:20AMZ004)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：人类学在中国的发展历经波折,相关研究者对此已有颇多论述,学科设置演变和学科发展竞争为系统分析中国人类学学科发展提供了更好的分析、反思视角。客观回顾中国人类学的发展历程,其学术研究成果颇丰、影响巨大,但中国人类学在历史时期的学科地位被想象性地言过其实。学科恢复重建之后,人类学同民族学的发展纷争对其学科地位产生了严重冲击,人类学理论研究有限的社会贡献和公众认知也是限制学科发展的重要因素。为此,中国人类学的发展应从构建自我理论话语体系、加强应用研究、丰富研究对象、扩大社会影响等方面入手,争取学科未来发展的更大可能性。The development of Chinese anthropology has gone through many twists and turns, which has been discussed by relevant researchers. The evolution of discipline setting and discipline development competition provide a better research perspective of systematic reviews and reflection the development of Chinese anthropology. An objective review of the development of Chinese anthropology shows that its academic research results are abundant and influential, but the status of Chinese anthropology in the historical period has been imaginatively exaggerated. The struggle for discipline status between anthropology and ethnology has a serious impact on its disciplinary status, and meanwhile, the limited social contribution and public cognition of anthropological theoretical research also limit its disciplinary development. Hence the development of Chinese anthropology should start with constructing the theoretical discourse system of anthropology with Chinese characteristics, strengthening applied research, enriching research objects and expanding social influence, so as to strive for more possibilities for the future development of the discipline.

关 键 词：人类学 民族学 学科发展 一级学科 

分 类 号：C95[社会学—民族学]