论环境污染第三方治理的刑法归责  

Criminal Responsibility for Third Party Governance of Environmental Pollution

作　　者：任卓冉[1] Ren Zhuoran

机构地区：[1]江南大学法学院

出　　处：《江海学刊》2022年第3期168-175,256,共9页Jianghai Academic Journal

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“环境污染第三方治理法律制度完善研究”(项目号:19CFX078)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：环境污染第三方治理是现代环境治理体系应对环境风险的产物,刑事责任界定是保证其治理有效性的重要组成。第三方治理污染环境罪中刑法归责的特殊性,使传统因果关系理论无法对其中复杂行为类型的案件予以妥善解决。污染环境罪向预防主义的转向,使客观归责论的引入成为可能。以风险升高理论作为第三方治理复杂行为类型案件因果关系认定的补充,在归因层面以概率提升作为判断标准,在归责层面以规范修正限定风险类型,能够厘正第三方治理污染环境罪的因果关系认定范围,细分归责层次,促进刑法理论与环境犯罪及治理政策的衔接,进而达致保护环境法益与保障人权的平衡,推动环境治理目的之实现。The third-party governance of environmental pollution is the product of the modern environmental governance system to deal with environmental risks,and the definition of criminal responsibilities is the important composition to ensure the effectiveness of its governance.The particularity of this type of crime on the issue of causation cannot solve the cases of the complicated behavior in the third party’s pollution control crime,which reflects the inability of the existing imputation theory to explain the environmental governance policies and norms,and it is also the crux of the current criminal liability definition dilemma.The turning of the crime of environmental pollution to prevention has made it possible to introduce the theory of objective imputation.Taking the theory of risk elevation as a supplement to the factual attribution of third-party governance of complex behavioral cases,can achieve a balance between the protection of environmental legal benefits and the protection of human rights,thereby promoting the realization of environmental governance goals.

关 键 词：环境污染 第三方治理 刑事责任 污染环境罪 客观归责 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]