论《徐邈音切研究》与《〈字林〉音注研究》的差异--兼谈二者的创新与不足  

On the Differences between the Study of Xu Miao's Yinqie and the Study of Zilin's Phonetic Notation--On the Innovation and Deficiency of The Two

作　　者：赖逸平 宋华强 LAI Yiping;SONG Huaqiang(Department of Chinese Language and Literature,Fudan University,Yangpu Shanghai 200433,China;School of Literature,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu Anhui 241003,China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学中国语言文学系,上海杨浦200433 [2]安徽师范大学文学院,安徽芜湖241003

出　　处：《四川职业技术学院学报》2022年第3期142-147,共6页Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College

摘　　要：古人徐邈、吕忱等著有魏晋时期的相关音注,现代的研究成果有《徐邈音切研究》和《〈字林〉音注研究》。它们在材料、方法、观点等方面均存在差异。二者皆以《经典释文》的引音为主要材料,选取材料范围却存在较大差异:前者采用“枚举归纳推理法”,后者采用“系统比较法”;二者构拟的音系存在差异。它们各有创新与不足。Xu Miao and Lv Chen wrote relevant phonetic notation of Wei-Jin dynasty.Modern research achievements include the Study of Xu Miao's Yinqie and the Study of Zilin's Phonetic Notation.They are different in materials,methods and viewpoints.Both of them take the annotation of classics as the material,but there are great differences in the range of materials.The former uses the enumeration induction method,while the latter uses the systematic comparison method.The phonology of the two is not the same.They have their own innovations and shortcomings.

关 键 词：魏晋音注 引音研究 《徐邈音切研究》 《〈字林〉音注研究》 

分 类 号：H113[语言文字—汉语]