检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Nouman Rasool Muzamal Rasool
机构地区:[1]Center for Professional and Applied Studies,Lahore,Punjab,Pakistan [2]High Court,Lahore,Punjab,Pakistan
出 处:《Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine》2022年第2期62-67,共6页法庭科学与法医学杂志(英文)
摘 要:Expert evidence is admissible under articles 59 and 164 of Qanun-e-Shahadat Ordinance,1984(Law of Evidence),in the courts of law in Pakistan.However,the enacted laws and judicial precedents are inadequate to help a trial judge to get an answer to the question about the reliability and credibility of expert evidence.The process of judicial scrutiny of the expert evidence is challenging in the absence of national guidelines/standards,nonaccreditation of crime laboratories,and poor scientific knowledge of judges and lawyers.Therefore,the judges encounter difficulty in evaluating the knowledge and skills of an expert,validity of principles and methodologies used,application of quality management system,relatability,and reliability of expert evidence.While facing difficulty in ascertaining the level of certitude of expert evidence,the courts accept the expert testimony only when it corroborates the prosecution's propositions,which is a kind of disservice to justice.The reliance of courts on expert evidence varies from case to case,which can be observed in the form of many sporadic judicial decisions.
关 键 词:ADMISSIBILITY expert evidence forensic science justice system of Pakistan RELIABILITY
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.41.22