检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁浙皓 Yuan Zhehao(University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100029)
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学,北京100029
出 处:《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2022年第2期67-73,共7页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“民国时期民事裁判中的‘法理’研究”(21BFX005)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:《中华人民共和国民法典》延续了《民法通则》的做法,将法定成年监护制度视为行为能力的补正措施,致使该制度存在适用范围过窄、过剩介入等问题。我国法定成年监护制度的问题根源并非是与行为能力的挂钩,而在于“无行为能力人、限制行为能力人”的概念过于抽象,导致被监护人的行为能力遭到了全面的剥夺或概括的限制。为此,可以引入日本法上的“辨识事理能力”,藉由对成年监护制度相关规范的理解与适用,来弱化成年监护制度与行为能力挂钩所产生的不利影响。The Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China continues the practice of the General Principles of Civil Law, and regards the statutory adult guardianship system as a measure to correct the capacity of conduct, resulting in problems such as too narrow scope of application and excessive intervention in the system. The root cause of the problem of China’s statutory adult guardianship system is not the linkage with the ability to act, but that the concept of “incapacitated person and person with limited capacity” is too abstract, resulting in the guardian’s ability to act has been completely deprived or generalized. The “ability to discern facts” in Japanese law can be introduced to weaken the adverse effects of the link between the adult guardianship system and the ability to act through the understanding and application of the relevant norms of the adult guardianship system.
关 键 词:《中华人民共和国民法典》 成年监护 行为能力 辨识事理能力
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.166.23