论清代的书院教育与赋学批评  

Academy Education and Criticisms of Fu in the Qing Dynasty

作　　者：禹明莲[1] YU Minglian(School of Language Arts,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550001,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州师范大学文学院,贵州贵阳550001

出　　处：《中北大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第4期65-70,76,共7页Journal of North University of China：Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大课题:历代赋论整理研究(19ZDA249);教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目:赋集选本与理论批评(19XJC751010)。

摘　　要：清代的书院教育与赋学批评关系密切。在山长的影响及教导下,生徒极力提高赋体创作水平,为清代馆阁赋作、赋集的大量出现打下基础。书院有关赋体的藏书、刻书、选本、评点等活动,为生徒习赋、作赋创造了良好的氛围和激励体制。考课作为书院管理的主流,就题目看,以律赋题为主,极少数拟古题。然书院生徒对古赋的重视潮流,既与元明以来的复古思潮一脉相承,又和清代科举试赋文体上采用律体之制、内容上要求古体气韵相关,因此,是清代赋体辨析思潮的重要组成部分。Academy education was related to the criticisms of Fu in the Qing dynasty.Under the influences and guidance of principals,the students of academies improved the level of Fu they wrote,which laid a foundation for the Guan Ge Fu and anthologies in the Qing dynasty.The activities such as collecting,engraving,selecting and commenting on Fu in the academies provided good environment and incentives for students to learn and create Fu.The assessments in the academies did not focus on antient Fu,but the academies still emphasized antient Fu because of the revival of antient Fu since the Yuan and Ming dynasties and the requirement of the imperial examinations of the Qing dynasty on antient Fu.

关 键 词：清代 书院教育 赋学批评 

分 类 号：I207.23[文学—中国文学]