因第三人欺诈而订立的合同研究  

A Research on Contracts due to Fraud of the Third Party

作　　者：汤裕杰 杨颖 Tang Yujie;Yang Ying(Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701)

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院法律学院,上海201701

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2022年第2期25-29,39,共6页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

摘　　要：在德国民法中,第三人欺诈属于意思表示错误的范畴,而我国对意思表示错误没有统一规定,两者在处理意思表示错误与第三人欺诈的关系时存在差异。第三人欺诈的目的各不相同,或为了自己的利益,或为了受领人的利益,或是基于其他目的而实施欺诈,其恶意程度的差异、救济方式的不同将对第三人欺诈合同的效力产生影响。要对第三人欺诈中第三人范围做出一定的限制,代理人、一人有限公司的股东、利害关系人能否成为第三人值得探讨。以可撤销法律行为的视角,从理论上研究第三人欺诈合同的效力,并在此基础上理清第三人欺诈制度与重大误解和物的瑕疵担保责任等的关系,对理论和实务具有指导意义。The fraud of third person belongs to the category of mistake of intention expressed in German civil law,but there is no unified regulation of it in China.There are differences between them in dealing with the relationship between mistake of intention expressed and third-party fraud.The purpose of the fraud of third person is different,or for their own interests,or for the interests of the recipient,or for other purposes.There are different levels of malice and different remedies,which affect the validity of the con⁃tracts.It is necessary to restrict the scope of the third party,including the agent,the shareholder of one man limited company and the interested person.This paper studies the validity of the third-party fraud con⁃tract in theory from the perspective of voidable juristic act,and clarifies the relationship between the third party fraud system and major misunderstandings and the liability for warrant of defects on the objects,which is of guiding significance to theory and practice.

关 键 词：意思表示 错误 第三人欺诈 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]