反海外贿赂视角下企业合规不起诉制度构建研究  

Research on the Construction of Corporate Compliance Non-Prosecution System from the Perspective of Anti-Foreign Bribery

作　　者：廖宇星 涂雨欣 Liao Yuxing;Tu Yuxin

机构地区：[1]湖南工商大学

出　　处：《廉政学研究》2022年第2期110-128,280,共20页Clean-Governance Study

摘　　要：反海外贿赂合规是国家与企业治理海外商业贿赂的重要手段。目前我国企业反海外贿赂合规发展缓慢,原因是我国刑诉法中不存在合规不起诉制度,刑事合规激励机制无法发挥作用。这种激励机制运行的前提是对海外贿赂犯罪的管辖权,基本逻辑是合规成为公诉机关决定是否对涉嫌犯罪企业起诉的依据。本文将企业海外贿赂犯罪分为两种类型,在此基础上,分析不同类型犯罪的主体范围、追诉机关,以及《刑事诉讼法》《刑法》规定的不起诉制度中“合规”作为不起诉依据的制度空间,从而探讨如何构建起我国的合规不起诉制度。Anti-foreign bribery compliance is an important tool for countries and enterprises to manage overseas commercial bribery.At present,the reason for the current slow development of anti-foreign bribery compliance in China’s enterprises lies in the fact that a compliance non-prosecution system does not exist in China’s criminal prosecution law,and the criminal compliance incentive mechanism cannot play its due role.The incentive mechanism operates on the premise of jurisdiction over overseas bribery crimes,and the basic logic is that compliance becomes the basis for the public prosecution to decide whether to prosecute an enterprise suspected of a crime.On the basis of overseas bribery crimes of enterprises which are classified into two types,this paper analyzes the subjects of such crimes,the scope of the subjects,the prosecution authorities,as well as the institutional space of compliance as the basis for non-prosecution in the existing non-prosecution system under the Criminal Procedure Law and Criminal Law,so as to set up to a compliance non-prosecution system in China.

关 键 词：海外贿赂 合规 不起诉 刑事激励 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]