检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王桢 冯罗华[2] Wang Zhen;Feng Luohua(Department of Infection Management,Changzhou Wujin People's Hospital,Jiangsu,Changzhou 213002;Changzhou Wujin People's Hospital of pediatrics Jiangsu,Changzhou 213002)
机构地区:[1]常州市武进人民医院院感科,江苏常州213002 [2]常州市武进人民医院儿科,江苏常州213002
出 处:《常州实用医学》2022年第2期79-81,共3页CHANGZHOU PRACTICAL MEDICINE
摘 要:目的分析2种不同剂型布洛芬对小儿感冒发热的退热效果,为临床择优选择应用提供依据。方法将80例感冒发热患儿随机分为研究组和对照组,每组40例。研究组用直肠给药栓剂治疗,对照组用口服液剂型治疗,比较两组的治疗有效率和不良反应发生率。结果治疗有效率研究组和对照组分别为97.50%95.00%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。不良反应发生率研究组和对照组分别为2.50%、20.00%,研究组明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论布洛芬不同剂型对感冒发热患儿均有效,但栓剂不良反应少,应用更方便简捷,患儿依从性高。Objective To observe the antipyretic effect of two different dosage forms of ibuprofen on children with cold and fever,so as to select the clinical application.Method 80 cases of children with cold and fever from January 1,2020 to December 31,2020 were selected as observation objects.Accord-ing to"random number representation",they were divided into two groups.The study group was given suppository by rectum,and the control group was given oral liquid dosage form commonly used by chil-dren.The clinical effects of the two groups were compared.Results The effective rate was 97.50%in the study group and 95.00%in The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group(2.50%)was signifi-cantly the control group,and there was no significant difference between the two groups.lower than that in the control group(20.00%),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Different dosage forms of ibuprofen are both effective in children with cold and fever,but suppository has fewer adverse reactions,more convenient and simple application,and high compliance of children,which is wor thy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.226.170