检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐素田 王思哲 汪凯[1] XU Sutian;WANG Sizhe;WANG Kai(School of Humanities and Social Sciences,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei,Anhui,230026;School of Journalism&Communication,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu,Anhui,241003)
机构地区:[1]中国科学技术大学人文与社会科学学院,安徽合肥230026 [2]安徽师范大学新闻与传播学院,安徽芜湖241003
出 处:《自然辩证法通讯》2022年第6期112-118,共7页Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项“科学传播中的科学家形象构建”(项目编号:WK2110250011)。
摘 要:科技统计显示,女性科研人员虽已日趋成为当代科学事业发展的主要参与力量,但仍处科学职业边缘。本研究分析了2017-2018年《科技日报》所刊1067幅科研人员新闻插图,发现在数量占比、与新闻内容的匹配程度等方面,女性科研人员均低于男性科研人员,证实了女性科研人员在新闻构建中的缺席趋势加剧这一基本假设。究其成因,系普遍存在的新闻偏见所致。本文进一步指出,中国科技新闻报纸需有意识地提高女性科研人员插图数量及其图文匹配程度,以符合女性科研人员的实际占比,从而对女性参与科学及其职业发展有所助益。As the development of science,women scientists have shown positive participation trends in different national reports,although the social reality is that women is still on the edge of the scientific profession.In this study,we analyzed 1067 photographs in 2017 and 2018 in the Science and Technology Daily.Women scientific researchers are still less present than man in the press picture,and their representation to match the content is also lower.These results confirmed the assumption that the absence of female scientific researchers in the news construction.According to the study,this social fact is rooted in the prevailing news bias.Based on this analysis,Chinese media should aware of such underrepresentation and try to increase the number of women scientific researchers’ pictures and the photographs’ matching ratio to meet the actual occupation of female researchers.This suggestion will help women to participate in science and their career development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15