深圳市102户家庭学龄儿童居家环境伤害危险因素分布与住宅类型的关联性研究  

Associations between Injury-related Family Environmental Factors and Different Types of Residence among 102 School-age Children in Shenzhen

作　　者：徐英[1] 刘峥[1] 郭艳芳[1] 李志学 李毅文[1] 马艳 赵仁成[1] 何向阳[1] 汪媛[2] 雷林[3] 彭绩[3] XU Ying;LIU Zheng;GUO Yan-fang;LI Zhi-xue;LI Yi-wen;MA Yan;ZHAO Ren-cheng;HE Xiang-yang;WANG Yuan;LEI Lin;PENG Ji(Depattment of NCD Comprehensive Control,Shenzhen Baoan Center for Chronic Disease Control,Shenzhen 518102,China;Department of Injury Prevention and Mental Health,Center for the prevention and control of NCD,Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Beijing 100050,China;Department of surveillance of Chronic Disease,Shenzhen Center for Chronic Disease Prevention,Shenzhen 518000,China)

机构地区：[1]深圳市宝安区慢性病防治院慢性病综合防制科,深圳518102 [2]中国疾病预防控制中心慢性非传染性疾病预防控制中心伤害防控与心理健康室,北京100050 [3]深圳市慢性病防治中心慢病监测科,深圳518000

出　　处：《伤害医学（电子版）》2022年第2期35-40,共6页Injury Medicine(Electronic Edition)

基　　金：联合国儿童基金会“2016-2020儿童伤害预防项目”;深圳市卫计委项目,基金编号:SZGW2018007。

摘　　要：目的探索学龄儿童居家环境伤害危险因素及与住宅类型的关联性,为制定针对性儿童伤害的干预措施提供依据。方法随机抽取6~17岁学龄儿童家庭作为研究对象,在中国疾病预防控制中心编制的“儿童安全家庭检查清单”上增加居住类型、年级和性别变量,进行预约入户调查。关联分析采用一般线性模型并校正年级和性别因素的影响。结果共调查102户家庭,其中城中村43家。在校正年级和性别因素后,城中村较住宅区(电梯楼)和住宅区(楼梯楼)的家庭“安全占比”低,分别为(0.48±0.09),(0.57±0.11)和(0.60±0.20),F=7.699,P=0.001。三种住宅类型前十位不安全因素均体现在“儿童锁”、“尖角处的防护措施”、“电源插座防护套”等方面。结论学龄儿童居家环境伤害家庭干预的重点措施重点关注给“橱柜加儿童锁、电源插座加上防护套以及家具尖角处加上防护装置”等,且干预的重点应为居住在城中村的家庭。Objective To analyze associations between injury-related family environmental factors and different types of residence among school-age children,and to recommend evidence-based measures for preventing children’s injury.Methods Families of school-age children aged 6-17 were randomly selected as the study subjects.The safety checklist of home setting which was developed by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,together with addition of types of residence,grade and sex was used to evaluate security.Associations between types of residence and safety of home settings were analyzed using general linear model with adjustment for grade and sex.Results 102 families were selected and 43 of them were’village in the city’.Compared to’building with an elevator in the community’and’without an elevator’,the safety proportion of’village in the city’was lower(0.48±0.09,0.57±0.11 and 0.60±0.20,F=7.699,P=0.001).The factors of’Child safety lock’,’Protection measures at the sharp corners’and’Power socket protection sleeve’were ranked the first 10 of in-security regardless of types of residence.Conclusions The key measures of family intervention for home environmental injury of school-age children include"adding child locks to cabinets,adding protective covers to power sockets and adding protective devices to sharp corners of furniture",etc.,and the strength of the intervention measures should be focused on families living in’village in the city’.

关 键 词：伤害 学龄儿童 居住类型 居家环境 关联分析 

分 类 号：R179[医药卫生—妇幼卫生保健]