检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]内蒙古科技大学经济与管理学院
出 处:《社会福利》2022年第3期33-43,共11页Social Welfare
基 金:国家自然科学基金“老龄化背景下我国农村老年多维贫困的测度、致贫因素及扶贫政策研究”(项目负责人:赵周华,项目编号:71964027);内蒙古哲学社会规划一般项目“内蒙古老年家庭多维贫困的测度、致贫因素及扶贫政策研究”(项目负责人:赵周华,项目编号:2018NDB084);内蒙古自然基金面上项目“老龄化背景下中国老年相对贫困的识别及治理研究”(项目负责人:赵周华,项目编号:2021MS07018)。
摘 要:国际上人口老龄化不断加剧,积极老龄化逐渐成为全球应对老龄化的最佳方案。中国脱贫攻坚战已经如期完成,全面消除多维相对贫困成为未来改善民生的目标。在中国老龄化程度不断加深、老龄化问题不容忽视的现状下,老年群体成为未来全面消除多维相对贫困的“硬骨头”。而指标和权重的确定是消除老年多维相对贫困的关键,由此文章在积极老龄化背景下对老年多维相对贫困的指标体系进行探索,确定选取收入、健康、教育、就业、社会保障和社会交往六个维度,并对等权重法、主成分分析、熵值法三种权重确定方法进行比较。研究发现,熵值法确定的权重更符合中国国情。The aging of the international population is increasing, active aging has gradually become the best solution to the global aging. The battle against poverty in China has been completed as scheduled, and comprehensively eliminating multidimensional relative poverty has become the goal of improving people’s livelihood in the future. In addition, the aging degree in China is deepening and the aging problem cannot be ignored. The elderly group becomes the “hard bone” for the comprehensive elimination of multi-dimensional relative poverty in the future. And to determine the weighing values of indicators and is the key to eliminate aging multidimensional relatively poor, thus this paper under the background of the aging of the positive exploration on the multidimensional relative poverty index system for the elderly, determine the income, health, education, employment, social security and social intercourse six dimensions,and equivalent weight method, principal component analysis and entropy value method to compare three methods of determining weight. It is found that the weight determined by entropy value method is more in line with China’s national conditions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.52.13