检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴宇鹏 范安成 吴仁海[1] 冯相昭 汪云卿 肖绮眉 钟保民 罗淑芬 邓坚勇 蒋松华 张智胜 张毅强 WU Yu-Peng;FAN An-Cheng;WU Ren-Hai;FENG Xiang-Zhao;WANG Yun-Qing;XIAO Qi-Mei;ZHONG Bao-Min;LUO Shu-Fen;DENG Jian-Yong;JIANG Song-Hua;ZHANG Zhi-Sheng;ZHANG Yi-Qiang(School of Environmental Science and Engineering,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510006,China;South China Institute of Environmental Sciences,Ministry of Ecology and Environment,Guangzhou 510655,China;Substantial Technologies(Guangzhou)Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510006,China;Policy Research Center for Environment and Economy,Ministry of Ecology and Environment,Beijing 100029,China;Guangzhou Huake Environmental Protection Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510655,China;Guangzhou Scie-Work Environmental Protection Technology Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510275,China;Guangdong Dongpeng Holding Co.,Ltd.,Foshan 528000,China;Foshan Rongzhou NO.2 Building Ceramics Factory Co.,Ltd.,Foshan 528000,China)
机构地区:[1]中山大学环境科学与工程学院,广州510006 [2]生态环境部华南环境科学研究所,广州510655 [3]韶实科技(广州)有限责任公司,广州510006 [4]生态环境部环境与经济政策研究中心,北京100029 [5]广州华科环保工程有限公司,广州510655 [6]广州市汕环科环保科技有限公司,广州510275 [7]广东东鹏控股股份有限公司,佛山528000 [8]佛山市溶洲建筑陶瓷二厂有限公司,佛山528000
出 处:《气候变化研究进展》2022年第3期373-380,共8页Climate Change Research
基 金:中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项(PM-zx703-202105-180,PM-zx703-202105-181)。
摘 要:干法制粉是陶瓷行业重要的节能减排技术之一,但目前并未得到广泛应用。文中以南、北方各一家代表企业作为案例,针对干法制粉开展减污降碳协同增效评估。通过文献调研和实地考证,采用产排污系数法计算了干、湿法制粉技术大气污染物和CO_(2)减排量,并进行了对比分析。结果表明,与湿法制粉工艺(天然气)相比,同样生产1 t粉料,干法制粉可以减少51%的CO_(2)排放;同时大气污染物明显下降,其中颗粒物降低了42%,NO_(X)下降了45%,SO_(2)降低了42%。协同控制交叉弹性分析结果进一步表明干法制粉在减排大气污染物的同时可以实现较好的温室气体减排效果。由于南、北方原料含水率的差异,北方干法制粉能耗与南方相比下降51%,在原料含水率较低的北方应用干法制粉减污降碳效果更好。The dry-milling process is an important part of energy conservation and emission reduction technology in ceramic industry.However,it has not been widely applied.This paper evaluates the synergy between pollution reduction and carbon reduction of dry-milling process in the two representative enterprises in the south and the north of China.Through literature research and field research,the emission reductions of air pollutants and CO_(2)in dry and wet milling technology were calculated by product coefficient method.Compared with the wet-milling process,the same production of 1 t powder can reduce the CO_(2)emission by 51%of the dry milling technology.At the same time,the air pollutants can be significantly reduced,such as PM is reduced by 42%,NO_(X)is reduced by 45%,and SO_(2)is reduced by 42%.The cross elasticity of dry powder collaborative control is positive,which shows that dry milling can realize the synergistic emission reduction of air pollutants and CO_(2).Due to the difference in the moisture content of raw materials between the south and the north of China,the energy consumption of dry milling in the north decreased by 51%.The effect of reducing pollution and carbon by dry milling is better in the north with low moisture content of raw materials.
分 类 号:X781.5[环境科学与工程—环境工程] TQ174.6[化学工程—陶瓷工业]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49