油气勘探类科技论文内容审读方法  

On reviewing manuscripts of scientific and technological papers of oil and gas exploration

作　　者：冯娜 FENG Na(Editorial Office of China Offshore Oil and Gas,CNOOC Research Institute Ltd.,100028,Beijing,China)

机构地区：[1]中海油研究总院有限责任公司《中国海上油气》编辑部,北京100028

出　　处：《编辑学报》2022年第2期170-173,共4页Acta Editologica

摘　　要：论文内容审读是科技期刊编辑工作的关键环节,编辑需要掌握可操作性强的审读方法。本文以油气勘探类科技论文的审读工作为例,将论文内容的审读划分为敏感性问题判断、内容创新性判断和科学性、逻辑性判断3个步骤,并举例阐述了各步骤的要点。判断敏感性问题,编辑应高度重视论文中可能涉及的意识形态问题和学术伦理问题;判断内容创新性,编辑应将创新点细化和具象化,既要总结识别科技论文中的共性创新点,更要归纳自身学科的特色创新点;判断科学性、逻辑性,科学性的判断一般必须依靠编辑对具体相关科学知识的学习和积累才能提升,但逻辑性的判断则具有普遍规律,应分别对引言部分、正文部分的逻辑性以及各部分之间的逻辑闭合性进行分析。遵循这3个步骤及各步骤的审读要点,基本上可以较好地把握住油气勘探类科技论文的内容情况。The review of scientific and technological papers is a crucial step among works of editors in sci-tech journals and requiring a practical way in doing so.Taking the scientific papers of oil and gas exploration as an example,this article divides the whole review process into three steps:sensitivity judgment,innovation judgment and scientific&logic judgment,and elaborates the key points of each step.To judge the sensitive issues,editors should attach great importance to the ideology issues and ethics issues that may be involved in the manuscripts.To judge the content innovation,editors should refine and visualize the innovation,not only summarize and identify the common innovation points in scientific and technological papers,but also explore the characteristics of the innovation in their own disciplines.The scientific judgment generally can only be improved by long term learning and accumulation of a specific field,but the logic judgment have universal law,and should include analysis of the logic of the introduction,text and the logic among each part.Following the above three steps and the main points of each step,we can have a better understanding and evaluation on any manuscripts.

关 键 词：油气勘探类科技论文 内容审读 敏感性问题 内容创新性 科学性和逻辑性 

分 类 号：G232[文化科学]