科技期刊论文“同等贡献”作者署名井喷现象分析及对策  

Analysis and countermeasures on surge of “equal contribution”authors in scientific and technological journal publications

作　　者：王宁宁 游苏宁[2] 刘红霞[3,4] 吕鹏 张佳玮[3,4] 沈锡宾 WANG Ningning;YOU Suning;LIU Hongxia;LYU Peng;ZHANG Jiawei;SHEN Xibin(Department of Portal Hypertension&Cirrhosis,Room 419,69 Dongheyan Street,Xicheng District,100052,Beijing,China;不详)

机构地区：[1]中华医学会杂志社《门静脉高压与肝硬化》编辑部,北京100052 [2]中华医学会继续教育部,北京100710 [3]中华医学会杂志社新媒体部,北京100052 [4]医学期刊知识挖掘与知识服务重点实验室,北京100052 [5]中华医学会杂志社《癌症发生与治疗》编辑部,北京100052

出　　处：《编辑学报》2022年第3期249-253,共5页Acta Editologica

基　　金：2021年中国科技期刊卓越行动计划高起点新刊(2021-001)。

摘　　要：分析中华医学全文数据库收录的“同等贡献”作者署名的文献,发现科技期刊论文中“同等贡献”的作者署名因学科交叉、跨界创新的增加而兴起,由于学术评价的利益攸关却疏于监管等原因导致使用渐泛。我们认为,对不当“同等贡献”作者署名的治理要从政策引导入手,通过建立多元化的评价机制,不断在激励交叉融合创新和恰当署名间寻找新的平衡点;同时,科技期刊界要通过引导、规范署名及合理创新机制,为端正学术风气、厘清学术贡献、激励全面创作而营造风清气正的出版环境。Through an analysis of articles authored with“equal contribution”in the Chinese Medical Journal Full-text Database,this study pointed out that the attribution of authors with“equal contribution”has become increasingly widespread in scientific and technological journals because of the emergence of interdisciplinary cooperations and cross-border innovations,and the vital role of academic evaluation in the midst of an absence of supervision.We suggested that the control of this phenomenon should be rooted in policy guidance and aim to achieve a new balance between encouraging interdisciplinary cooperation,integrating domains,and promoting innovation with proper attribution through the establishment of diversified evaluation mechanisms.What’s more,the scientific and technological journals should create an honest and ethical publishing environment,clearly define academic contributions,and encourage more research under proper guidance,standardized attribution,and a robust innovation mechanism.

关 键 词：同等贡献 作者署名 学科交叉 政策引导 多元评价体系建设 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]