迈向一种兼具整全性与规范性的多元现代性——基于艾森斯塔特多元现代性论说的分析  

Towards a Pluralistic Modernity Both Holistic and Normative:An Analysis Based on Eisenstadt’s Theory of Multiple Modernities

作　　者：孙国东 Sun Guodong

机构地区：[1]复旦大学社会科学高等研究院

出　　处：《东南学术》2022年第4期113-123,247,共12页Southeast Academic Research

摘　　要：作为亨廷顿“文明冲突论”和福山“历史终结论”之外关于现代化的第三种理论视野,艾森斯塔特的“多元现代性”论说可以为非西方社会探求适合自己的“他种现代性”道路提供理论依据。该论说从现代性内在的人之能动性和“强烈反身性”、社会进化中的“精英功能”及“轴心文明”之超越秩序的历史延续性等方面入手,对多元现代性进行了宗教社会学和历史社会学的理论奠基,但亦被认为消解了现代性的规范性内涵。一种真正适合中国情境的多元现代性理论,应当既能保有现代性的规范性内涵,亦能确保现代性实现形态的多元性具有统合价值、制度和实践层面的整全性。As a third theoretical vision of modernization besides Huntington’s theory of“the clash of civilizations”and Fukuyama’s notion of“the end of history”,Eisenstadt’s theory of“multiple modernities”can provide a theoretical basis for a non-Western society to explore its own road of“alternative modernities”.Starting from the aspects of the human agency and“intensive reflexivity”inherent in modernity,the“elite functions”in social evolution and the historical continuity of transcendental orders in“axial civilization”,this theory lays a theoretical foundation for multiple modernities by religious sociology and historical sociology,but it is also believed to dispel the normative connotation of modernity.A pluralistic modernity theory which is truly suitable for the Chinese context should not only retain the normative connotation of modernity but also ensure that the pluralism of modernity realizing form has the wholeness of integrating value,system and practice.

关 键 词：多元现代性 艾森斯塔特 现代性的多样性 解放 文明 

分 类 号：C06[社会学]