检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何欣 庄丽萍 黎绮栅 黄红兵[1] 刘韬[1] 周捷[1] HE Xin;ZHUANG Li-ping;LI Qi-zha;HUANG Hong-bing;LIU Tao;ZHOU Jie(Department of Pharmacy,Center for Prevention and Treatment of Tumor of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510060,China;Pharmaceutical Sciences of Guangzhou Xinhua College,Guangzhou 510520,China)
机构地区:[1]中山大学肿瘤防治中心药学部,广州510060 [2]广州新华学院药学院,广州510520
出 处:《中国新药杂志》2022年第11期1080-1084,共5页Chinese Journal of New Drugs
基 金:吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项基金资助项目(320.6750.2020-10-91)。
摘 要:目的:回顾分析比较利妥昔单抗原研药美罗华与国产生物类似药汉利康在与CHOP联用治疗方案中的疗效和不良反应是否具有显著性差异,探讨2种药物更替使用对疗效和不良反应是否产生影响。方法:收集接受利妥昔单抗与环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱、泼尼松联用方案(R+CHOP)治疗弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的资料,按不同的药品厂家将患者设为3组,只使用美罗华的为M+CHOP组、只使用汉利康的为H+CHOP组、先用美罗华后改用汉利康的为M/H+CHOP组。收集各组患者的影像学诊断、细胞学检查、血常规检测、心肌生化指标、发生感染和发热症状的记录,以卡方检验分析各组患者中肿瘤学指标出现异常和出现不良反应的发生率是否具有显著性差异。结果:在M+CHOP组、H+CHOP组和M/H+CHOP组中,肿瘤学指标出现异常的发生率均没有显著性差异(P>0.05)。在不良反应比较中,M+CHOP组血小板减少的发生率(17.58%)低于H+CHOP组(31.76%)和M/H+CHOP组(33.96%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.017)。结论:在R+CHOP治疗方案中,使用美罗华或汉利康对DLBCL疗效相当,两药更替使用对疗效和不良反应影响不大。相对于单用汉利康和更替用药,单用美罗华血小板减少的发生率较低。Objective:To compare the efficacy and adverse reactions of rituximab original drug(Mabthera)and its biosimilar(Hanlikang)in CHOP chemotherapy and to study the efficacy and adverse reactions in the alternative use of the two drugs retrospectively.Methods:Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomas(DLBCL)who received rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide,doxorubicin,vincristine and prednisone(R+CHOP)were collected.According to rituximab of different manufacturers used,the patients were divided into three groups:M+CHOP group was treated with Mabthera,H+CHOP group was treated with Hanlikang,and M/H+CHOP group was treated with both drugs.The imaging diagnosis results,cytological examination,hematological examination,myocardial biochemical examination,infection and fever symptoms of patients in each group were observed.Chi square test was used to analyze whether there were significant differences in the frequency of abnormal oncological examination and adverse reaction events in each group.Results:There was no significant difference of abnormal oncological items among M+CHOP group,H+CHOP group and M/H+CHOP group(P>0.05).Regarding adverse reactions,the incidence of thrombocytopenia in M+CHOP group(17.58%)was lower than that in H+CHOP group(31.76%)and M/H+CHOP group(33.96%)significantly(P<0.017).Conclusion:There is no significant difference in efficacy between Mabthera+CHOP and Hanlikang+CHOP,reflecting that the efficacy of rituximab from the two manufacturers is equivalent,and the alternative use showed little influence on the efficacy.In the treatment of rituximab combined with CHOP,Mabthera showed lower probability of thrombocytopenia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143