检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张爱军 杨佳琪 ZHANG Ai-jun;YANG Jia-qi(School of Journalism and Communication,Northwest University of Political Science and Law,Xi’an 710062,China)
机构地区:[1]西北政法大学新闻传播学院,陕西西安710062
出 处:《青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第2期56-62,共7页Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
摘 要:社交媒体对公众的赋权是一把双刃剑。一方面可以革新公众社会参与的方式,公众可借助社交媒体发挥话语权从而促进信息公开;另一方面,在互联网匿名身份的许可下,部分公众的行为逐渐失控,并走向不理智的群体狂欢。社交媒体时代公民权利的放大与失控行为存在激烈的冲突与矛盾,并在社交媒体时代呈现明显的正负效应,透过释放公众话语权的传播民众化转向的表面,公民行为的规范及其背后的运行机制仍是需要持续研究的课题。理性与非理性冲突的调试之策不仅需要硬法治之,更需从根源析出实质矛盾,革新互联网治理模式、识别不同语境下的舆情研究、完善监测机制或许是可行路径。Social media’s empowerment of the public is a double-edged sword.On the one hand,it can innovate the way of public social participation,so the public can use social media to exert their voice and promote information openness.On the other hand,with the permission of anonymity on the Internet,part of the public’s behavior is gradually out of control,becomes collectively irrational.In the era of social media,the amplifi cation and out-of-control behavior of civil rights have intense confl icts and contradictions,which have caused obvious positive and negative eff ects.Through the release of the public discourse power of the communication to the surface of the popular turn,the standardization of citizen behavior and the operating mechanism behind it is still a subject that needs to be studied continuously.The adjustment of the confl ict between rationality and irrationality not only needs to enforce the rule of law,but also needs to separate out the essential contradiction from the root.It may be feasible to innovate the Internet governance model,identify public opinion research in diff erent contexts,and improve the monitoring mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.176