农村空巢与非空巢失能老人日常照料差异研究——基于倾向得分匹配方法的实证研究  

The Study of Daily Care Difference between Empty Nest and Non-Empty Nest of Rural Disabled Elderly——Evidence from Propensity Score Matching Method Analysis

作　　者：陈灵肖[1] 郭红东[2] 

机构地区：[1]台州职业技术学院 [2]浙江大学农村发展研究院

出　　处：《社会福利》2022年第4期25-33,39,共10页Social Welfare

基　　金：浙江省教育厅高等学校访问学者专业发展项目:“基于农村空巢老人养老需求的居家养老服务供给侧研究”(项目负责人:陈灵肖,项目编号:FX2018121);台州市哲学社会科学规划重点项目课题“基于农村空巢老人养老需求的居家养老服务供给侧研究——以台州为例”(项目负责人:陈灵肖,项目编号:18GHZ02)。

摘　　要：文章基于2015年中国健康与养老追踪调查数据,采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)方法,测算居住模式对农村失能老年人日常照料的影响,研究家庭照料资源在老年人日常照料中的作用。研究发现,非空巢失能老年人比空巢失能老年人获得更多的子女照料,在工具型生活自理能力方面至少增加26.4%的实际照料,而对基本日常生活自理能力照料的影响不显著;和子女共同居住能够使失能老年人未满足的照料需求总体下降24.8%,且结果显著;子女作为照料者能够从一定程度上减轻老年人配偶的照料压力,但是替代效应有限。研究表明家庭养老资源在农村老年人日常照料中依然发挥主要作用,因此鼓励对开展失能老年人照料的子女进行政策支持,社区为日常照料缺失的空巢失能老年人尤其是独居老年人有针对性地提供居家养老服务项目。This paper uses 2015 data of Chinese Health And Retirement Longitudinal Study,and based on the propensity score matching method(PSM)to measure the effect of living arrangement on rural disable elderly daily life care,and study the role of the family resource in elderly care.The results show that,compare with empty nest elderly,Living with adult children is positive to elderly daily life care,it is significant positive for elderly IADL care,The effect is about 26.4%,while not significant for elderly physical activity of daily life;Also living with children can significant reduce the elderly care need for about 24.8%;Living with children is positive for children to take care of disabled elderly,and is negative to the pressure of spouse caregiver,but the substitution effect is limited.Results show that family support is still have an important role in elderly daily care.Encourage government to make policy to support children who take care of their elderly parents,and the community should provide care support for empty elderly especially lonely elderly whom lack of daily care.

关 键 词：空巢老人 农村失能老人 日常照料 照料需求 

分 类 号：C913[经济管理]