检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陆安清[1] 谢妍妍 简福顺 张森[1] 马东扬[1] 宋应寒[1] 雷文章[1] Lu Anqing;Xie Yanyan;Jian Fushun;Zhang Sen;Ma Dongyang;Song Yinghan;Lei Wenzhang(Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China)
机构地区:[1]四川大学华西医院胃肠外科中心,成都610041
出 处:《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》2022年第3期258-261,共4页Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition)
摘 要:目的探讨局部冰敷对腹股沟疝修补术后伤口疼痛及渗出的影响。方法选取2017年12月至2018年3月四川大学华西医院收治的单侧原发性腹股沟疝患者60例,随机分为冰敷组和对照组,每组患者30例,均采用局部麻醉下腹股沟疝无张力修补术。冰敷组在术后常规治疗的基础上局部加用挤压后医用冰袋冰敷,对照组在术后常规治疗的基础上局部加用非挤压医用冰袋压迫。观察2组术后24 h内患者静息状态的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS),术后需要追加止痛药物数量及术后切口敷料的渗出例数及面积。结果冰敷组在术后6、12、24 h的VAS评分明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);冰敷组术后镇痛药使用数量6例(20.0%)低于对照组21例(70.0%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);冰敷组术后切口敷料渗出2例(6.7%),低于对照组6例(20%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。切口敷料渗出患者中,冰敷组平均渗出面积(0.30±0.71)cm^(2)低于对照组(4.18±2.54)cm^(2),但差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。2组术后的切口均顺利愈合。结论局部冰敷为腹股沟疝修补术的患者提供了一种安全、有效且副作用少的止痛方式,但其对伤口渗出的影响有待更进一步研究。Objective To investigate the effect of local ice compress on incision pain and exudation after inguinal hernia repair.Methods A total of 60 patients with unilateral primary inguinal hernia in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from December 2017 to March 2018 were enrolled.They were randomly divided into two groups:ice compress group(30 cases)and control group(30 cases).All patients underwent tension-free inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia.On the basis of routine treatment after operation,ice compress group was locally applied with extruded medical ice bag,and the control group was locally applied with non-extruded medical ice bag.The visual analogue score(VAS)degree of pain within 24 hours after operation,the amount of analgesic drugs,and the number and area of postoperative incision dressing exudation were collected and compared between two groups.Results The VAS scores of ice compress group were significantly lower than that of the control group at 6,12,and 24 hours postoperatively,the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).Furthermore,the number of analgesics used in the ice compress group[6(20%)]after operation was significantly less than that in the control group[21(70%)],and the difference between the two groups was significant(P<0.001).There were two cases(6.7%)and 6 patients(20%)had incision dressing exudation in the ice compress group and the control group,respectively,and no significant difference between the two groups was observed(P>0.05).In patients with incision dressing exudation,the average exudation area in the ice compress group(0.30±0.71)cm^(2) was less than that in the control group(4.18±2.54)cm^(2).However,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).The incision healed smoothly after operation in both groups.Conclusion Local ice compress provides a safe,effective and less side effect way to relieve pain for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair,but its effect on wound exudation needs further study.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.252.90