检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邱国强 牛潜 吴振华[2] 郭珊珊 秦琳 汪应宏[3] QIU Guoqiang;NIU Qian;WU Zhenhua;GUO Shanshan;QIN Lin;WANG Yinghong(School of Public Administration,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou,Jiangsu 221116,China;School of Economics and Management,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou,Jiangsu 221116,China;Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information Engineering,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou,Jiangsu 221116,China)
机构地区:[1]中国矿业大学公共管理学院,江苏徐州221116 [2]中国矿业大学经济管理学院,江苏徐州221116 [3]中国矿业大学,江苏省资源环境信息工程重点实验室,江苏徐州221116
出 处:《水土保持研究》2022年第4期400-406,414,共8页Research of Soil and Water Conservation
基 金:国家自然科学基金(51874307);江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX21_2110);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2021QN1058)。
摘 要:为了探究城镇建设用地扩张对土地利用冲突的影响,以城镇化水平快速提高的苏锡常地区为例,基于1990—2018年土地利用分类数据,采用景观风险评价方法,通过计算空间的外部压力、脆弱性及稳定性指数构建土地利用冲突综合测度模型,借鉴倒“U”型理论,将空间冲突分为稳定可控、基本可控、基本失控和严重失控4种类型,对苏锡常地区空间冲突水平进行了评估。结果表明:(1)近30年来,苏锡常地区整体空间冲突水平以可控类型为主,但冲突强度呈现上升趋势,1990—2018年平均冲突指数由0.269增长至0.418,近1.55倍;(2)不同用地类型的空间冲突强度存在差异,林草地和水域空间冲突水平较低,建设用地空间冲突水平最高且失控类型在1990—2018年提升了14.3%,有进一步激化扩散趋势;(3)土地利用冲突存在空间相互关系,高—高值在苏、锡、常市中心区及江阴、张家港、常熟、昆山市集聚,低—低值则主要分布在西部溧阳市山地及水域周边。研究结果可为有效识别苏锡常地区土地利用冲突,优化区域发展模式提供理论参考。In order to explore the impact of urban construction land expansion on land use conflict,Su-Xi-Chang urban agglomeration was taken as the research area to analyze the temporal and spatial characteristics of land use conflict by calculating indices of the spatial external pressure,vulnerability and stability.Based on the inverted‘U-shaped’theory,space conflicts were classified into four types:stable control,basic control,basic out of control and serious out of control.The results show that:(1)over the past 30 years,the overall level of spatial conflict in Su-Xi-Chang area was in a controllable state,but the intensity of conflict showed an upward trend,with the average conflict index increasing from 0.269 in 1990 to 0.418 in 2018,nearly 1.55 times;(2)there were differences in spatial conflict intensity among different land use types;specifically,the spatial conflict level of forest,grassland and water area was low,while that of construction land was high and the state of out of control increased by 14.3%during the study period,showing a trend of further intensification and diffusion;(3)there was a spatial correlation between land use conflicts;the high-value areas concentrated in the central areas of Suzhou,Wuxi and Changzhou,as well as Jiangyin,Zhangjiagang,Changshu and Kunshan,while the low-value areas mainly distributed in the mountains and waters of Liyang City.This study can provide theoretical reference for effectively identifying land use conflicts and optimizing regional development patterns in Su-Xi-Chang urban agglomeration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145