所有权保留出卖人之破产取回权再审视--基于《民法典》担保实质化设计之视角  

Re-examination of the Retrieval Right of Retention of Title Sellers from Bankruptcy:Based on the Perspective of Substantive Design of Guarantees in Civil Code

作　　者：胡少锋 HU Shao-feng(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan,Hubei 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法律硕士教育中心,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《湖北职业技术学院学报》2022年第2期98-105,共8页Journal of Hubei Polytechnic Institute

基　　金：中南财经政法大学研究生创新教育计划项目“所有权保留出卖人的破产取回权再分析--基于《民法典》担保实质化设计的视角”(项目编号:2022011746)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：我国《民法典》在所有权保留形式所有的基础之上引入实质担保的设计,造成了相关法律规则在理解上的冲突和适用中的困难,破产法基于以往形式担保的观念赋予所有权保留出卖人以取回权,而未言及其任何内在的担保目的,引起赋予出卖人取回权或别除权之争论。在明晰民法及破产法所有权保留规则之间冲突的基础上,对所有权保留性质进行界定,可发现担保性是现行法下认定所有权保留性质的核心,体现到破产程序中,应基于所有权保留的这种担保特性赋予出卖人以别除权,以实现相关规则的衔接与各方利益的平衡。China's Civil Code introduces the design of substantive security on the basis of the form security concept of the retention of title,resulting in conflicts in the understanding and application of relevant legal rules and the bankruptcy law gives the retention of title seller the right of retrieval based on the previous concept of form security,without mentioning anything about its intrinsic security purposes,which gives rise to the controversy over the right of retrieval or exclusion granted to the seller.On the basis of clarifying the conflict between the civil law and the retention of title rules of the insolvency law,the nature of the retention of title is defined,and it can be found that security is the core of the nature of the retention of title under the current law and embodied in the bankruptcy proceedings.The seller should be given the right of exclusion based on the security characteristics of the retention of title so as to achieve the convergence of the relevant rules and the balance of interests of all parties.

关 键 词：所有权保留 别除权 取回权 实质担保观 形式担保观 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]