检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘楠峰[1,2] 范莉莉 李树良[3] 陈肖琳 毛亮 LIU Nan-feng;FAN Li-li;LI Shu-liang;CHEN Xiao-lin;MAO Liang(School of Economics&Management,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China;School of Management,Sichuan University of Science&Engineering,Zigong 643000,China;Westminster Business School,University of Westminster,London NW15LS,UK;Law School,Sichuan University of Science&Engineering,Zigong 643000,China)
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学经济管理学院,四川成都610031 [2]四川轻化工大学管理学院,四川自贡643000 [3]威斯敏斯特大学商学院,伦敦NW15LS [4]四川轻化工大学法学院,四川自贡643000
出 处:《系统工程》2022年第3期13-23,共11页Systems Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71271177);教育部人文社会科学项目(17YJA630013)。
摘 要:本文通过构建基于多主体的碳交易仿真系统,运用计算实验方法,分别对碳配额分配、排控目标、市场结构等碳交易制度对企业碳减排环境绩效和经济绩效的影响进行研究。研究结果表明:(1)在大部分情境下,行业对标法分配碳配额、提升排控目标强度能有效促进企业技术减排,提升企业碳减排环境绩效;碳交易制度对企业碳减排环境绩效的影响和市场供需状况相关,从动态视角看,影响效果随着时间推进愈发明显。(2)企业实施技术减排能产生正的经济绩效,是对“波特假说”的有力支撑;同时,在大部分情境下,严苛的碳交易制度将削弱碳减排经济绩效,则印证了“波特假说”的对立观点:环境政策影响经济绩效。In this paper,by constructing a multi-agent carbon trading simulation system and using computational experiment methods,the influences of the carbon quota allocation,the emission control target,the market structure on the environmental performance and the economic performance of the enterprises’carbon emission reduction are studied.The research results show that:(1)In most scenarios,allocating carbon quota by industry benchmarking method and improving emission target intensity can effectively promote enterprises technological emission reduction and improve their carbon emission reduction environmental performance.The influences of carbon trading system on enterprises’carbon emission reduction environmental performance is related to the market supply and demand.From a dynamic perspective,the effect becomes more and more obvious over time.(2)The implementation of technological emission reduction by enterprises can produce positive economic performance,which is a strong support for the“Porter Hypothesis”.At the same time,in most scenarios,stringent carbon trading will weaken the economic performance of carbon emission reduction,confirming the opposing view of the“Porter Hypothesis”that environmental policies influence economic performance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.189.4