检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田国双[1] 齐英南 邹玉友 TIAN Guo-shuang;QI Ying-nan;ZOU Yu-you(College of Economics and Management;College of Wildlife and Nature Reserve, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040,China)
机构地区:[1]东北林业大学经济管理学院,哈尔滨150040 [2]东北林业大学野生动物与自然保护地学院,哈尔滨150040
出 处:《商业研究》2022年第3期134-141,共8页Commercial Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目,项目编号:72003022,71973021;黑龙江省博士后基金项目,项目编号:LBH-Z20037。
摘 要:基于可持续生计框架,利用东北国有林区职工320份的调研数据,采用多元Logistic模型和倾向得分匹配法,探讨林业补贴政策对林区职工生计的影响效应。研究表明:林业补贴政策对林区职工生计策略和收入均产生重要影响;林区职工拥有的自然资本越多,越倾向选择纯林业型生计策略;物质资本对兼业林业型生计策略无显著影响,对非林业型生计策略有正向显著影响;人力资本、社会资本和金融资本丰富,倾向选择兼业林业型和非林业型生计策略。进一步检验发现,林业补贴政策对林区职工收入有正向效应但不显著,选择纯林业型生计策略的林区职工参与林业补贴政策对工资性、转移性和财产性收入均有正向显著影响,而选择非林业型生计策略的林区职工参与林业补贴政策对转移性收入有正向显著影响。Based on a sustainable livelihood framework,by using 320 research data from Northeast state-owned forest workers,adopting the Multivariate Logistic Model,and utilizing the Propensity Score Matching method(PSM),this paper explores the effect of forestry subsidy policy on the livelihood of forest workers.Research shows that forestry subsidy policy has a substantial effect on the livelihood strategies and income of forest workers.The more natural capital that workers have,the more they choose pure forestry livelihood strategies.Besides,physical capital has no significant influence on part-time forestry livelihood strategies,but has a positive and significant influence on non-forest livelihood strategies;Human capital,social capital,and financial capital are abundant,the part-time forestry and non-forestry livelihood strategies are more inclined to choose.Further inspection found that the forestry subsidy policy has a positive but not significant effect on the income of forest workers.The participation of forestry workers who choose a pure forestry livelihood strategy in the forestry subsidy policy has a positive and significant impact on wages,transfer income and property income,And forest workers who choose non-forestry livelihood strategies to participate in forestry subsidy policies have a positive and significant impact on transfer income.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.51.214