检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡从燕 CAI Cong-yan(Fudan University School of Law,Shanghai 200438,China)
机构地区:[1]复旦大学法学院,上海200438
出 处:《上海对外经贸大学学报》2022年第4期40-54,共15页Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
摘 要:近年来,国际法学者日益关注城市在国际秩序中的规范性作用。由于城市在不少西方国家的宪制架构下往往拥有较大的权力以及西方国家长期主导国际关系,城市与国际法律秩序关系的理论与实践存在明显的西方中心主义倾向。中国崛起、特殊的中央—地方宪制与政治权威架构使得中国城市与国际法律秩序互动的实践可以超越西方中心主义。上海始终在中国参与国际秩序中扮演着重要角色,并且蕴含着发挥更大作用的潜力。上海应当基于城市与国际法律秩序关系的视野重新思考发展目标与定位,即寻求迈向“国际法律之都”。这不仅对于上海自身的发展具有重要意义,对于我国探索在统筹推进国内法治和涉外法治过程中如何选择适当的法治场所也是有益的。In recent years,the normative role of cities in the international legal order has drawn increasing attention by international lawyers.Given that cities obtain greater authority in the context of central-local constitutional framework and Western powers had long been prominent in international relations,legal theory and practice in relation to cities in international legal order has characterized with remarkable Western-centrality.However,due to China’s rise,unique central-local constitutional framework as well the structure of political authority,the interactions between Chinese cities and international legal order have the potential to proceed beyond the Western-centrality.Shanghai has always been prominent in the process of China’s engagement with international order,and is expected to play a greater role in this regard.Shanghai should recalibrate its development goal in the light of the relationship between cities and international legal order,namely,moving towards an "international law capital".This is not only significant for Shanghai s future development.It is also helpful for China in exploring suitable legal forum in the context of comprehensively enhancing the domestic rule of law and foreign-related rule of law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.131.147