检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨帆 马晓军 杨文勇 李治鹏 张梅 欧阳思蒙 邢颖 刘畅 杨红梅 刘招佚 YANG Fan;MA Xiaojun;YANG Wenyong;LI Zhipeng;ZHANG Mei;OUYANG Simeng;XING Ying;LIU Chang;YANG Hongmei;LIU Zhaoyi(Guangyuan Central Blood Center,Guangyuan 610000,China)
出 处:《中国输血杂志》2022年第6期605-607,共3页Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion
摘 要:目的评估检测HIV抗原/抗体的电化学发光免疫分析法(ECLIA)在献血者血液筛查中的应用效果。方法选取本站2016年9月~2020年9月采用ELISA法抗-HIV反应性的献血者标本128(人)份[双试剂反应性7份(其中WB确认抗-HIV阳性6份、NAT确认抗-HIV阴性1份),单试剂反应性121份(均经WB确认为阴性)]以及从本站2020年6~9月以ELISA法筛查和NAT检测均为非反应性的献血者留存标本中随机选取1360(人)份,用ECLIA法对这2类献血者标本做HIV抗原/抗体检测;比较2种方法的检测结果,包括HIV阳(阴)性符合率、敏感性与特异性。结果对于1360份ELISA和NAT检测均为非反应性的标本,用ECLIA检测亦均为非反应性。ECLIA法对于ELISA法检测和确认试验均为献血者HIV反应性标本的检测结果符合率100%(6/6);对于ELISA法抗-HIV检测反应性但确认试验阴性的122份标本的HIV抗原/抗体检测反应(性)率3.28%(4/122)、非反应(性)率96.72(118/122)ECLIA法与ELISA法的总体符合率为96.88%(124/128)。ECLIA的敏感性、特异性和假阳性率分别为100%,99.73%和0.27%;ELISA的敏感性、特异性和假阳性率分别为100%、91.77%和8.23%。结论检测HIV抗原/抗体的ECLIA法同时具有良好的敏感性和特异性,可以满足献血者血液筛查的要求,且较血站目前常规使用的ELISA法检测的HIV假阳性率更低。Objective To evaluate the performance of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay(ECLIA)in detecting HIV antigen/antibody in blood screening.Methods A total of 128 donors,reactive to anti-HIV(ELISA)testing,from September 2016 to September 2020 were enrolled,and seven samples were reactive to double anti-HIV reagents,among which 6 were confirmed by WB,1 confirmed by NAT as negative.Two group of donors,reactive to solo anti-HIV reagent but being confirmed negative by WB(n=121)vs.randomly selected donors non-reactive to ELISA+NAT(June to September 2020,n=1360),were subjected to HIV antigen/antibody testing using ECLIA to compare the testing results,including concordance rate,sensitivity and specificity.Results The ECLIA results remained non-reactive for 1360 samples initially non-reactive to both ELISA and NAT.The concordance rate of anti-HIV reactivity by ECLIA and ELISA+WB were 100%(6/6).For 122 samples,reactive to ELISA anti-HIV testing but nonreactive to confirmatory testing,4(3.28%)of them were reactive to HIV antigen/antibody testing and 118(96.72%)nonreactive,with the concordance rate of ECLIA and ELISA at 96.88%(124/128).The sensitivity,specificity and false positive rate of ECLIA and ELISA were 100%vs 100%,99.73%vs 91.77%,and 0.27%vs 8.23%,respectively.Conclusion ECLIA for HIV antigen/antibody detection has good sensitivity and specificity,which can meet the requirements of blood screening,and the false positive rate is lower than that of ELISA,adopted commonly in blood bank at present.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7