检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪敏 王洪友[1] WANG Min;WANG Hongyou(Southwest University of Science and Technology,Mianyang 621000,China)
机构地区:[1]西南科技大学,四川绵阳621000
出 处:《郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版)》2022年第4期35-39,共5页Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:以市场利益为内在驱动,经商业策略运作形成规模效应的版权维权诉讼,由于维权的商业牟利特性,诉讼权利基础一直处于位份不当的尴尬处境。基于权利人自觉标准,商业维权划分为“委托代理型”和“权利获取型”两种模式,尤其是“权利获取型”维权之基础,受到《著作权集体管理条例》中主体职能规定以及法经济学视角下社会无谓损失、经济效率等原则排斥。因此,为革除时弊,有必要从主体资格审查、“三振出局”模式引入、量化损失、设置禁诉期等方面加以规制。Copyright rights protection litigation,which is intrinsically driven by market interests and has formed a scale effect through the operation of commercial strategies,has always been in an embarrassing situation of improper position due to the commercial profit-making nature of rights protection.The underlying reason is that the two commercial rights protection models,which are divided into“authorized agency type”and“right acquisition type”based on the rights holder’s conscious standard,are excluded by the relevant main functional provisions of the Collective Copyright Management Regulations,and the principle of unnecessary loss of economic efficiency in society.Therefore,in order to eliminate the shortcomings of the times,it is necessary to add regulations from the aspects of subject qualification review,the introduction of the strike-out model,quantifying losses,and setting a period of prohibition of litigation to achieve system improvement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117