检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐启 Tang Qi
机构地区:[1]上海大学文化遗产与信息管理学院
出 处:《档案管理》2022年第4期54-56,共3页Archives Management
摘 要:全宗思想源于法国,近代俄国借鉴其思想内涵创立全宗理论体系。俄国对档案工作的重视始于莫斯科公国时期,成熟于罗曼诺夫王朝时期,体系化全宗理论成型于20世纪初的苏联时期,俄罗斯对苏联档案全宗体系进行了继承和发展。通过梳理中国的档案全宗理论体系,并在此基础上对比中国、苏联和俄罗斯的档案全宗理论,发现其在国家档案全宗、全宗、全宗内文件的分类三个维度下均具有相似之处;又因社会性质及国情的不同,在档案机构隶属关系、国家档案全宗概念及构成、档案全宗立法、全宗内特有概念名称、管理方式等方面存在不同之处。The fonds theory originated from France,and modern Russia used its ideological connotation to create a system of the fonds theory.Russia's emphasis on archival work began in the Principality of Moscow.It was matured during the Romanov dynasty.The systemic fonds theory was formed in the Soviet era in the early 20th century.Russia inherited and developed the archive system of the former Soviet Union.By sorting out the theoretical system of Archives fonds in China and comparing the theories of Archives fonds in China,the Soviet Union and Russia,it is found that they have similarities in the three dimensions of the national Archives fonds,the Archives fonds,and the classification of Archives within the Archives fonds.And because of the different social nature and national conditions,there are differences in the affiliation of Archives institutions,the concept and composition of the national Archives fonds,the legislation of the Archives fonds,the unique concept names in the whole Archives fonds,and the management methods and so on.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7