“初选”与“重评”:当代文学批评的两种路向——兼谈批评的“历史化”问题  

“Primary Selection” and “Re-evaluation”:Two Trends of Contemporary Literary Criticism——with a Discussion of the “Historization” of Criticism

作　　者：吴秀明[1] Wu Xiuming(Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学文学院,浙江杭州310058

出　　处：《河南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第4期116-123,共8页Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：二十世纪九十年代以来,受诸多因素影响,当代文学批评出现了“结构性变化”。为了对以往过于执迷的主观化理路进行反思,有效地提升其质量,有必要提出批评的历史化问题。当代文学批评,主要有“新人新作初选”和“经典作家作品重评”两种路向。前者,借助文学史压抑机制对作家作品进行筛选,由此构成批评历史化的第一道环节,当下需要正视的不仅是数量上的浩瀚存在,更突出的是文体形式内容丰富复杂已远超我们习见的观念认知。后者,作为历史化的第二道环节,就代际角度考量,当务之急是启动五代作家中的前两代,当然在经典重评实践时,将不可避免地涉及批评的实践主体和语境化等问题。Since the 1990s,influenced by many factors,contemporary literary criticism has undergone structural changes.In order to reflect on the too subjective tendencies and effectively improve them,it is necessary to put forward the issue of historical criticism.Contemporary literary criticism has two trends:primary selection of new writers and works and re-evaluation of classic ones.The former selects works with the help of the suppressive mechanism of literary history,constituting the first step of the historization of criticism.What we must face at present is not only the large quantity of such works,but also the rich and complex literary styles far beyond our usual cognition.The latter,as the second link of historization,is surveyed from the perspective of generations of writers.At present,it is urgent to activate the first two of the five generations.Of course,when re-evaluating the practice of classics,it will inevitably involve the practice subject and contextualization of criticism.

关 键 词：当代文学批评 新人新作初选 经典作家作品重评 批评历史化 

分 类 号：I206.09[文学—中国文学]